No, besides occasionally being walking ads for Prozac.
They're both part of the Wonderful World of Disney.
That's right, I'm sure many of you have heard by now that in a whopping $4 billion deal, the Walt Disney Corporation has bought out Marvel.
I'm unsure whether to be excited or concerned. I mean, Disney has not been exactly on the ball handling their own estate (that's in my opinion, not based on financial statistics), and now they've come into possession of some major property in terms of beloved fictional characters.
What are your thoughts on this?
Random Aside: Any one else notice that the media--not to mention me--covering this story only mention Spiderman as the prime example of what Marvel is known for? I know, he's probably the best known character general speaking, but still what's up with that? The X-Men and Ironman are gonna start smashing skulls if they keep getting the shaft.
EDIT: In a class I was sitting in on, a student just asked in honest-to-God sincerity, "Who is Marvel?"
I think I may have had a stroke.
Comments
I think Marvel is known for the X-Men. Spider-Man is very popular, but I read a few years back that Wolverine is still the most popular comic book character.
Pooh: I hadn't heard that. Hmm, I wonder the liklihood of the deal being broken now. Everyone knows about it by this point. I don't even think I ever realized the Muppets were Disney property until a year or two ago.
Telvisnostic: God. The horror. The pure, unadulterated teenage horror.
NotDario: Hello, sir. You have quite an interesting user name, if you don't mind my saying.
I dare to stand out, LOL. Besides, it physically hurts me to mention the big mouse since his voice-actors death. Holy hell, I take it back: a Jonas as a super would be the ultimate horror.
LadyInque: Ironman's good too. Gotta love a hero with a drinking problem. ![]()
ShadowySeal: Very good you get the prize. *flees because she has no prize*
and Mickey Mouse Died!!!! o.o
2. The corporate part of the company make make the whole organization appear to be a brand whore, but the one thing Disney has always gotten over Nick is that whereas Nick hasn't aired any of its beloved programs from earlier years since Spongebob and TeenNick arrived in 1998, Disney at least sporadically airs its well-loved movie line every so often, even to this day.
3. Speaking of Nickelodeon, now that Disney owns Marvel, what does this mean for the Wolverine & the X-Men and Iron Man: Armored Adventures cartoons airing on Nick's originally old-school Nicktoons Network, given the fact that Disney and Nick are rivals for the same audience (likewise for Time Warner and even moreso now that Disney owns Marvel like Time Warner owns DC)?
Pooh: Here, here, my friend.
And by that do you mean the recent voice actor who did the Mickey Mouse Works cartoons? Cause the original voice of mickey only died a few months ago I would be shocked
DancingBeatle: A sure sign of the apocalypse.
WWinnieF
http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/09/01/Marvel_Shareholders_Want_More_From_Disney.htm
Hopefully, this means that Disney lets its Touchstone branch handle Marvel (since Touchstone makes more "adult" programs for the Mouse House), because what we don't need is the baby-fication of Marvel characters, nor do we need them in league with the teenybopper trash clogging our networks.