GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Saturday, Feb 11, 2006

I will now list the top ten shooters that made shooters what they are today. (Note: resident evil, mgs, dmc, etc. are not shooters, they are action adventures.)

  • 1. Half-Life
  • 2. Doom
  • 3. Golden Eye
  • 4. Unreal Tourament
  • 5. Socom: US Navy SEALs
  • 6. Battlefield 1942
  • 7. Sytem Shock 2
  • 8. Rainbow Six
  • 9. Medal of Honor: Frontline
  • 10.Halo

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
Thought Doom would come No. 1. Nice list otherwise.
Posted Feb 11, 2006 6:55 pm PT
overall good list, my favorite shooter is red faction
Posted Feb 11, 2006 7:08 pm PT
heres what i think:

Far Cry Instincts
Doom 1,2,3
Far Cry
Halo 1,2
Star Wars BF 1,2
Duke nukem 3d
Call of Duty 2, Big RED one, both

doesnt make much sense but a shooter fan will understand.
Posted Feb 11, 2006 7:23 pm PT
IMO halo 2 should replace Halo.
Posted Feb 11, 2006 8:12 pm PT
I agree, vashkey. fbrisevac, BF 1 & 2 are more third person shooters.
Posted Feb 11, 2006 8:33 pm PT
pretty good list
Posted Feb 11, 2006 10:09 pm PT
Goldeneye should be first.Everything else looks pretty up to par though.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 12:57 am PT
looks good to me.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 2:36 am PT
Good list... I would've put Doom first though.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 8:36 am PT
I Quite like Halo as a good shoot-um-up, specialy on multiplayer.

Secondaly, it must be doom, very fast and jumpy, the kinda things i love to shoot.

Thats it really, dont play much shoot-um-up games, but everynow and then when i feel like a change, will play shoot-um-ups round my mates house, with:

Time Splitters,
Halo,
Quake 3

All fun.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 10:08 am PT
I don't necessarily agree with most of your top 10.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 2:54 pm PT
I mean why are Socom: US Navy SEALs, Duke Nukem 3D, and Battlefield 1942 even on the list? They're just decent. Also, I wouldn't even consider Splinter Cell a shooter. Move up the Halos and the Call of Dutys.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 3:01 pm PT
I couldn't decide what should come first, doom or half-life. I put half-life because it perfected what doom started. And the reason y halo is so low, is its not that essential. It didn't change anything in the world of shooters.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 4:25 pm PT
The three biggest ommisions IMO are UT (pick which one, established vehicles and what truly was a multiplayer shooter) and Quake(the first shooter with jumping, started rocket jumping, first PC shooter to be ported to a console [I think--N64]) and System Shock 2 (Showed that atmosphere can be more enthralling than shooting.)
In their place I would cut out SOCOM, Duke, and Splinter Cell, which I don't consider a shooter.
Posted Feb 12, 2006 5:24 pm PT
Sup what about Battlefield 2 and Halo2. those are pretty dang good shooters?
Posted Feb 13, 2006 10:36 am PT
there were not essential to the progress of shooters, 2fast.
Posted Feb 13, 2006 4:25 pm PT
Eh, I mean Counter-Strike is based on Half-Life, but CS has made more of an impact. I'd have put that on there.

I'd also say that Halo 2 probably should bump Halo, just on "everyone plays it on Xbox Live" merit.

I'm also not sure what System Shock 2 is.

Otherwise, pretty good list.
Posted Feb 14, 2006 1:37 pm PT
Pretty good list. The only one I don't completely agree on is Socom.
Posted Feb 18, 2006 10:04 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • spectre37
  • Level: 1 (25%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 1
  • Messages Read: 3


advertisement

Friends

My Friends