GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Thursday, Nov 5, 2009

First, I just HAVE to make a snarky comment about this little gem recently said by a spokesman for Activision:

"In [calendar year] 2010, Activision Publishing is expected to release strong, innovative new titles," Activision Publishing president Mike Griffith told analysts. "The diversified lineup will include titles based on the best selling franchises including Call of Duty, Guitar Hero, Shrek, [and] Spider-Man."

"Innovative new titles?" "Diverse lineup?" Have the people working at Activision become delusional to the point of retardation? How is releasing new titles in your two most saturated franchises, indeed two of the ONLY franchises you EVER support anymore, and some crappy half-hearted movie tie-ins either innovative or diverse? The next Guitar Hero games will be EXACTLY like EVERY SINGLE GAME ever made in the franchise: A new collection of random songs that should be a ****ing DLC pack released as a brand new $60 game. Likewise the next Call of Duty is going to be made by Treyarch, which means it will be nothing more than a $60 mod of MW2 reskinned into a new setting.

Ugh...It seems like every time someone from Activision opens their mouth they say something that is a total wallbanger.

Now, the point of this post. It is a rant involving Magic: The Gathering. If you don't know anything about Magic, chances are you won't understand anything beyond this point.

So when I got back into Magic about a month ago I sold off some of the more valuable rares I don't use to get some extra cash to buy boosters from the newer sets I missed. One card was Dark Depths, a nonbasic land from Coldsnap. I never cared for the set; I bought a single fat pack from it and ended up pulling the only cards that I really cared about getting in those first few boosters, so I never bought anything else from the set.

Anyway, Dark Depths is one of those cards that is awesome in a flashy yet totally useless sort of way. It is a land that produces no mana. It's only purpose is that it can summon an uber-powerful creature, but it takes a crapton of mana and turns, to the point that 9.9 out of 10 games the battle will be over by the time you finally actually summon the creature. See, the land comes into play with 10 ice counters on it, and it takes 3 generic mana to remove just one counter. When there are no more counters on the land, you sacrifice it and get a massive 20/20 legendary Avatar that is indestructible and has flying. But, it takes 30 mana to actually summon it.

I always thought it was an awesome, albeit completely useless card. I decided to sell my only copy at the local hobby shop for $7 (It was only worth about $10 at the most at the time).

Well...A bit over a week ago some genius at a tournament used a combo to summon the 20/20 avatar for no mana and as early as turn THREE. He did this by using the Vampire Hexmage, an uncommon new card that came out in the most recent set. By using the Hexmage's sacrifice ability he can remove all of Dark Depths' ice counters and get the creature it summons for basically free. Or, if you count the Hexmage's mana cost, for only two black.

Suddenly, demand for Dark Depths has SKYROCKETED. The hobby shop owner ended up selling my very copy of Dark Depths for $60. The days following this combo surfacing on the Internet the card was selling for HUNDREDS on eBay. Things are slowing down now, but you can still find the card going for $25-$50 on eBay.

Had I just waited a few more weeks I could have sold this card for A LOT more money! DAMMIT!! gnu53netbye5ntrnrtj46nebhghr45uy3nhebhtehnjrsmjntbhebhtnetjem5netbh I HATE it when junk rares I've gotten rid of for a low price suddenly become a LOT more useful and worth tons of money because of a new set!

Now...I'm waiting for the set that suddenly makes the king of junk rares, One With Nothing, worth craploads of cash. I pulled FIVE of that bastard when I collected Saviors!

Category: Rant
Posted by raven28256, 7:51pm
8 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
You're right, I didn't understand anything after the snarky comment....

But I totally agree with the aberration of a comment that was Mr. Griffith's statement. So Shrek and Spider Man are big and innovative titles? WOW! As for Guitar Hero... I just don't how much more can they milk that franchise.
Posted Nov 5, 2009 8:33 pm PT
Hell yes! My box of cards that I was trying to sell is sitting right beside me, so I had to check and see if I had any Dark Depths, and I still have 2. I haven't checked my sales thread where I was selling them as nothing was selling after the first couple of weeks, I might have to go and update it.

In any case, $7 seems like a great price to me when it was a junk rare. I was trying to sell the vast majority of my rares for $1 because they aren't really useful in tournaments.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 3:23 am PT
Hahahaha oh dude that's brutal. I have very few magic cards, and I couldn't play the game if I wanted to, but I liked collecting them anyway.

I have a few rares, but I have no idea what they're worth (probably nothing) but the art is cool so I keep them.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 8:27 am PT


Activision-Blizzard not mentioning Diablo 3 or Starcraft 2? Now what's up with that?

I hate Activision.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 8:33 am PT
Honestly I had no idea people were still playing Magic. I haven't seen anyone play that game since the late 90s.

I did have a pretty sizable collection of cards from the Star Trek CCG that came out in the 90s. Haven't thought about that game in years. I should see if I still have those....
Posted Nov 6, 2009 9:10 am PT
@SYdoggXxX

One of these days Activision is going to realize that they can't just keep milking Guitar Hero and Call of Duty and expect to stay afloat. Infinity Ward at least manages to add enough new things each game to make it feel fresh, but Treyarch's offerings are just Infinity Ward's last game with a new skin. Activision's CEO knows nothing at all about gaming, so he can't see that his company will, eventually, fall in on itself because they have such a small pool of franchises that they are supporting to any large degree. The reason why companies like Ubisoft or Konami stay afloat is because they have such a varied, diverse pool of AAA franchises. Eventually people will get tired with Call of Duty and Guitar Hero. This ALWAYS happens at some point with big franchises that are spammed to the degree that Guitar Hero and Call of Duty are...and I can't wait to laugh and say "SEE!" when it does happen.

@bachus2

Well, as I said things are starting to calm down now, but the standard going price for Dark Depths in most price guides is still in the $30 range.

And yes, $7 was a good price over a month ago. Dark Depths sold for more than your typical junk rare because it was so cool. It is a genuinely awesome card, it just didn't have any real use in a realistic game of Magic until this combo surfaced.
Posted Nov 8, 2009 11:03 am PT
@xboxrulze

Yeah. I often find myself collecting cards not because I want to use them, but because I like the artwork. I have a full playset of Serra Angel, and only use her in one deck, but I still keep buying them when I see them being sold as singles in the local hobby shop. Why? Because I love the current artwork of the card. (It should also be noted that the fact that Serra Angel is a very powerful card is another reason why I love them) This is Serra Angel, by the way:

http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=193767

Another artwork love affair I'm in with a card from a very recent set is Kiss of the Amesha. Like Serra Angel it is a pretty good card, but the real reason why I collect them is the artwork:

http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=174976

In fact, the main reason why I took up Magic over all other card games out there (Besides the fun factor) is the fact that, I think, Magic has the best artwork out of all the current big and popular card games.

@pandaramaster

He was only talking about games from the Activision side of Activision-Blizzard. While they have merged, they are still semi-autonomous and tend to keep their hands out of each other's business.
Posted Nov 8, 2009 11:18 am PT
@johnsteed7

Magic is still very much alive and well. If my local hobby shop is any indication, it seems like Magic is even more popular these days then it has been in a while; I see a much more diverse number of players playing the game more often than I used to.
Posted Nov 8, 2009 11:18 am PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • raven28256
  • Level: 1 (0%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 1760
  • Messages Read: 0


Friends

My Friends