Okey Dokey

Actually, the guidelines say, "You should provide a specific source for all material. If there is a URL, provide the complete URL (rather than just "wikipedia"). If you don't and staff can't verify the information, your submission may be rejected with a request for the source."

So are you going to attempt to verify the info but reject if you can't (per the guidelines)? Or just reject automatically with no source (which isn't what the guidelines say)?

To be fair, if no source submitted will try to verify if unable to verify i will reject, asking to be resubmitted with source.

if no source submitted and i am able to verify i will also ask in acceptance PM for submitter to supply source next time. This is in line with TV.com standards isnt it ????

The link you provided is for editorless guides. For guides with editors, the editor must verify the validity of the submission if there is no source. If no validation can be made, then you may reject it, and ask the submitter for a source. It's against guidelines to automatically reject submissions without a source.

o... thanks for telling... next time i will remember...