my1sunshine

Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008

Been widening my TV-Com travels. I've been visiting the page for The Six Million Dollar Man... which was my favorite show when I was a kid. Hey, every young boy needs a hero.. this was mine. There doesn't seem to be anybody going there. I put up a couple new posts, but my expectations are low. Lifesigns are weak on older shows during peak months on this site, but during summer break, I understand it gets worse. But if anybody is reading this, and is a fan of that show.. give me a holla on the forum. I'd love to have someone to chat with about it!

Speaking of which, I finally decided to at least take a look at the latest Bionic Woman.. the one that was cancelled recently. I went to Hulu.com and watched the pilot. Yuck! Now I remember why I wasn't even interested in checking it out.. and I understand why it was cancelled after 8 episodes. I left my review on the main page.. it's also on my profile.

I read an interview with Ron Moore, longtime staff writer of Star Trek: Next Gen, DS9, and Voyager, not to mention , of course, creator of my current fave, Battlestar Galactica (oh, will the plugging never end?). Anyway, he was commenting on the current Star trek movie... now in post production.. to be released early 2009. He said some things that i kind of found disturbing, and a little dissapointing. They also kind of made me loose a little respect for the guy, which I didn't think was possible. I started a forum post and poll on the Star Trek:TOS page on this. It kinda unintentionally turned into a long winded editorial, and halfway through, I changed my mind, and was gonna do it as a blog on my page. But my Firefox won't let me cut and paste, and I didn't feel like loosing it or retyping, so I just continued and left it. If anybody's curious, check it out.

Still watching X-Files with Sapphire. I'm only at the beginning of the 7th season (Hungry), but I'm still going to try to finish the series before the movie release.

I just started watching Lost. Never seen it before. OMG, the first 2 episodes were amazing!

Also, got from Netflix the first two disks of Alias, and Heroes first seasons. Nver seen them before either. Will burn for later consumption.

What is going on with Movietome? If you'll notice, the link is no longer listed on top of the screen with the other CNET services. Metacritic is there instead. The site is still active, though..which is the only thing even the Mods seem to know at this point. If you go to the help forum, though..and click on either FAQ, or tech support, and then go to the top of your screen..the link will be there.

I know the site has been on the brink for a while, but you would thing CNET would have the decency , not to mention respect for it's users..to let us no what is going on with the site. There are some like myself, who have posted reviews there, who would like to know if we should save them in case the site get's taken down. I guess that's too much to expect. Shame on you CNET.

That being said, I would really like to thank angelandspike for getting back to me so quickly with any info she had on this and other issues. You should be well paid for your efforts and consideration.

Well, that's it for now. Take care everybody, and have a wonderful weekend.

Peace,

Ted

Posted by my1sunshine, 10:39am

1 Comment | Post a Comment

Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008

Life In Motion (Or lack Thereof)

Yo, yo, wassup, my peeps! Just wanted to report in, ya feel me? I took my previous blog down. You know.. the rant about the unfriendly, unsociable, stuck up, "too good for lil ol me" snobs? I figured the people whom I was addressing would never read it, so I deleted it, and PMed the people in question, to tell them personally what unfriendly, unsociable, stuck up, "too good for lil ol me" snobs they really were. And I feel a whooole lot better. Even if I get kicked off or banned..hey..what is life without a little danger, huh? I laugh in the face of danger. Ha-Ha-ha! (See?)

Anyway, sorry that I haven't been comunicating, especially with my new X-Files friends (Wasssuuuup!). Had a few things going on. Still no job yet, but...my wife Patti just greeted the arrival of her sixth grandchild. He is a healthy beautiful little boy named Malcolm Landon Mazar. His Mother , my step-daughter, Jessica arrived saftely back home a year ago, after four years in Iraq. So we are doubly blessed.

Patti had an accident with the car last week. Coming home from work about a mile from our house on a rainy night during rush hour, the car slid out of control, missing about five oncoming cars (I don't know how she wasn't hit), and hit the curb hard. She wasn't hurt, and it happened on a side street instead of the 30 miles of high-speed freeway she travels each trip, so I thank God for that! Damage was minimal, but even minimal damage can be expensive. Impact with the curb totaled the drivers side tire and rim, and threw the allignment out of wack. Just to make the car drivable again was 450 dollars...for that! Dosen't sound like much, but when you only have a hundred in the bank, it's a lot. Can anybody out there say.."overdraft"? I knew you could.

On the television front, we can no longer afford to have the Sci-Fi channel on our lineup, so I can no longer see the one current program I love, Battlestar Galactica live as it airs. Arrrrrgggghhh! I've missed the last three episodes, and I'll have to watch them via an internet stream. Speaking of which, the ruling just came down (it's been a rumour for months) that the episode this Friday will be the last new episode until at least January 2009! OMG! I was hoping for Fall.. but 2009?! How sick is that?!! Fans are betting that this weeks episode before the break will contain the Big Reveal... who of our beloved characters is the Final Cylon? I don't expect them to find Earth until after the break, but it means the rest of the journey will damed sure be plenty interesting. The show has been a very rewarding viewing experience. Having been not too crazy about a re-imaganing of one of my favorite childhood shows at the beginning, it didn't take long for the show to prove me wrong. Many twists, turns, dramas, and mysteries..handled in an intelligent, thought provoking , and realistic manner...which is rare for any show these days..but realistic, for a sci-fi show? Yep. It's been so much fun watching there guys change and grow...and that includes the bad guys. The lines between human and Cylon have inched closer and closer together, especially this season..that the terms good and bad aren't really applicable anymore. But after this reveal..it's going to be a long wait until January.

Usually, I don't complain too much about not being able to afford going out to the movies. Ticket prices, and concessions are ridiculous anyway, and the movie has to be a real big screen only event to make me pay that kind of money. But so far...I'm not going to get to see Iron Man or Indiana Jones...which sucks, big time. Especially Indy. I have been waiting for sooo long for Ford to put on that Fedora again. For a while, I didn't think they'd have a script ready until he was in an actors retirement home! But now it's here, and I can't see it! Whaaaaaaah!

My hope is that my financial straits will be better by the time my next big release comes out...X-Files II: I Want To Believe. Due in July, this is another one I doubted would make it. This beloved show was almost DOA in it's last year, back in 2002, as far as most fans were concerned. The upcoming release has re-stirred the fandom pot, and I and my wife are re-watching the series to get caught up. She's watching most of them for the first time, and having a ball doing it! I can't wait!

Some of these forums on here are sooo dead, particularly the one for Star Trek, the original series. I'm trying to stir up some life on there through some strategy of my own. If you're a fan of Star trek, and on my list, check out my new thread there. I really want to see how many people actually visit the forum, and then try and exchange ideas on how we can bring it back to life.

That's all for now. Life beckons, so I'll talk at ya all later. Holla at a brutha!

Peace,

Ted

Category: General

Posted by my1sunshine, 11:08am

2 Comments | Post a Comment

Saturday, May 10, 2008

The Best Show you're not watching

Sorry guys, I know it's relentless behavior. I know it's shameless plugging. But i have to do it. I've been telling people about this for awhile, and everybody who has given it a chance has gotten hooked, without fail. But still, too many people are not watching this show And it's the best show on TV right now, so, forgive the Paul Revere complex, but i would not be the kind generous and sweethearted person I am (are you ill yet?), unless I provided this service. Last night, I watched the latest episode of Battlestar Galactica (2003). You have to watch this show! It is getting too good! It's not about the ships, effects, or space battles, it's really about humanity, it's struggle for survival against the constant threat of extinction...it's a drama about people that just happens to take place in space and the mystery of life, death, religion, goverment, etc. It starts off taking it's time in the miniseries, introducing you to the characters, letting you get to know them and setting up the enviroment. It has characters you can like and care about , and the show has the best story archs since the X-files Mythology, filled with twists, turns, dramas and puzzles. If you start, a little stratagy here. First, program your Tivo or DVR to record what's on now for later consumption. Then, get/rent the mini-series first, then go through the seasons. If you buy the season one boxset, it has the mini-series as the first disk. There is are some webisodes between the second and third seasons that are on the Season three set, and a movie called Razor to be watched between the third and fourth season. The show is on it's fourth and final Season, and every twist and turn in the prior three seasons are paying off in spades. It's making me go back and watch the earlier shows for clues, and plot elements that I didn't notice before. Trust me, you'll be hooked, and doing marathons before you know it, and should catch up before they show the last half of the final season, and you'll be able to watch the end live with the rest of us. Trust me, oh please trust me, you will not be sorry. A little obsessed, and very entertained..but not sorry. Any questions, see my review on the show's page, or ask me. i love talking about this show...but I won't give away secrets. It's much more fun finding things out as you watch. Have a great weekend.

Category: TV

Posted by my1sunshine, 5:52am

6 Comments | Post a Comment

My Recent Reviews

my1sunshine has written 5 reviews.

River's Edge

Agree (1)

Disagree (0)

I somewhat remember watching this , or bits of it when it came out. But when my wife picked it out to watch, I couldn't remember much of it, which is strange and unusual for me. After viewing it again, I know why. I just didn't buy the premise. I mean, this kid kills his girlfriend, leaves it in a wide open place near a river, openly admits it to his friends, then takes them to see the body. He has now explaination for why he did it, has absolutely no remorse, and could care less about any consequenses, about the murder, or that all of his friends know. This is the basic plot that drives the movie. One of the friends, a bizzare manic played by Cripin Glover (what a shock)tries to protedt his friend, the murderer, by hiding him out and collecting money to get him out of town. Meanwhile Keanu Reeve's character sulks about the revelation, and dosn't waste much time filling the authorities in on what happened. There's a subplot involving Dennis Hopper, a drugged out, seemingly crazy old hippie, whom with Glover hides the murdering boy. Now, you could read this and think, woah, this sounds like something I may want to check out. Trust me, it's not. The premise or potential of it, is never even close to fully realized. Roebuck sleeps through his performance as Samson, the murderer. Crispin (Lane)is (as usual) bizzare and waaaay too over the top for this role, making him seem silly, and impossible to believe. Reeves ( the finker), well, let's face it, has never been the best actor in the world, but for a boy that is so haunted and disturbed by the situation, he shows practically no emotion or depth whatsoever, in a role that screams for those qualities. Skye has little to do except look beautiful, and Hopper, the great Dennis Hopper Feck is practically wasted in his role. The only scene which drew any interest from me at all, was the scene with Samson and Feck by the river, where the two exchange stories about the murders of their respective girlfriends. This is the only scene where Roebuck shows any lifesigns as an actor at all. It was a very enticing moment in an otherwise waste of a views time. What I could not buy is that..see, this takes place in a small town. And I know that small town youth can go a little crazy for lack of something to do, and having a somewhat stagnant life. But, you'd think in a town where nothing happens, a murder of one of their friends, ( not an aquaintence or just a classmate, we're talking about their own close-knit group, here) would draw a lot more emotion and drama than written or acted. These kids are numb. The way the police react to Reeve's story is unbelivable. They spend more time harassing the confessor than investigating the crime. And that's another thing..we're dealing with a small town with a big fishing river (fishing being the main sport in a small town with nothing much to do..and this body is left, over the course of two days, out in the open, and nobody sees it? And it's impossible to beleive that in any town, no matter how small and inactive, that all this bizzare and downright loud behavior can take place within this story, and not have more kids caught or arrested. The parents could care less, and there is a ridiculous subplot concerning Reeves younger brother, supposedly 12, who is the wildest and merciless kid in town. This kid goes around the whole movie with an evil sneer on his face, him and his friend drive all around town in a stolen car and are never stopped once (!!!!), ransack Hopper's house, knock him out, take his weed and his gun, all to get stoned out and kill his older brother who slapped him around a few times. He finally finds his target, then falls into wimp mode weeping when Reeves holds out his arms saying "I'm your Brother". What was all the buildup for? Not only did I expect that little anti-christ to die violently, I prayed for it. And I was cheated, damnit! All told considering the talent involved, and story potential, this was a downer of a movie, a disapointing view and a total waste of time and energy.

[-] Minimize Review

Report Abuse

Posted apr 11, 2008 12:59 am pt

Beverly Hills Cop

Agree (1)

Disagree (0)

This is what I call the perfect modern comedy. What a plus that it's also a great action and suspense piece as well. The story is nothing all that special. This is all about the characters, chemistry, cast direction, and timing. Eddie Murphy is flawless..and I mean flawless as Axel Foley. And considering that he came into the project two weeks before filming to replace Sylvester Stallone, (No, I am not kidding you), and that the final script was being re-written while filming, only adds to the legend of Murphy's talent. So much of the dialogue was based on improv. And what a cast..most of them brought on when Stallone was still the lead. Martin Brest knows how to direct and get the most out of this cast of fine performers. Judge Reinehold and John Ashton are absolutely hilarious as Taggart and Rosewood, two cops who are more like an old married couple. The routine in the car about the undigested red meat is priceless, as well as the Butch and Sundance reference near the end. (What movie buff didn't get that one?) Ronny Cox is great as the stone faced, put-upon Bogelmill, their boss. Lisa Eilbacher is stunning, and the villain of the piece, Victor Maitland played with a smug, icy perfection by Steven Berkoff, also shines. If anyone can be said to have stolen anything from Eddie in the entire movie..and in two very short scenes, it is Bronson Pinchot as Seirge. What an ingenious characterization! But it is, in the end, Eddie Murphy's vehicle and he drives it, no-holds-barred through the wall. Over the top only when needed, most of the time playing it fairly low keyed..his Axel Foley is always believable and likable. This movie gives him so many chances to shine, so many classic routines, so many lines, quoted endlessly by my friends who saw the movie at least twice in the theaters. Eddie would unfortunately, spend the rest of his career in the shadow of this movie. Don't get me wrong..he did some great stuff after this, but this was his peak..this one, he would never outdo, and he knows this..and he's okay with it. After all, how many actor/comedians are out there searching for their Beverly Hills Cop, and will never find it? Eddie...had his. And it will live forever.

[-] Minimize Review

Report Abuse

Posted mar 27, 2008 4:40 am pt

The Godfather Trilogy 1901-1980

Agree (0)

Disagree (0)

This is a fantastic package, and for a Godfather fan...a must see. If you got "The Godfather DVD Collection" you know that there is a wealth of cut scenes in the extra features (For one and Two..Godfather three has always been an expanded directors cut since it's arrival on video years ago.) Seeing these on their own is special, but seeing them woven back into the story is rapture. As we all know, seperately..these are loooonnng movies in and of themselves. Woven together with the extras, you're looking at an eleven and a half hour presentation. When Coppola presented a packaged version of the first two films for broadcast on NBC titled "The Godfather:The Complete Novel For Televison", it was the first time Vito's backstory from 2 was put to the beginning of the story, and added some deleted scenes. Later, a boxed VHS set..The Godfather:The Complete Epic was the same, but with even more scenes added. Now..adding still more footage, plus the third installment, came this entry.. The Godfather Trilogy. Now let's talk extras..this is the real meat. Speaking about all the footage would take too long, I don't think I can remember it all, and I want to leave something out so you can discover it for yourselves! All the same, this might take a while. The extras of young Vito's story arent all that spectacular, but some intersting bits. For instance, we get to see the assasination attempt on Don Fannuci which leads to him being a real tyrant..a few extra scenes of Genco and Vito, the full talk between Vito and Clamenza before Peter offers to give the carpet..First meeting with Tessio, and a gun-dealer scene,meeting (and naming) a young Hyman Roth...best of all..when Vito goes back to Corleone for his vengence... we get to witness him killing the actual men who killed his family, not just the Don. The footage from The Godfather is a more extensive. In the original film, there is NO scene between Pacino and Brando until the hospital after Brando is shot, and none with dialogue until the garden scene when Michael comes back from Italy. Here, we get a treat. Right after the wedding, they have two exchanges. The most telling is in the hospital, visiting a dying Genco, where Vito discusses with Michael things about their estrangement. The tension between Father and Son here is thick, and you can see how much Michael despises his Father just by his expressions. There is extra footage of Woltz's estate which show a scantily clothed very young starlett in the mogul's upstairs rooms. There is also an extra scene with Michael and Kaye in a hotel. The most extensive footage comes immediately after the shooting of Vito. You get to see Sonny getting the call, mobilizing his forces, and even telling his Mom. We learn here that Sonny immediately suspects Clamenza of betrayal. Another scene is right after Michael arrives at the house, he sits in on a meeting with Sonny and Tessio where it is discovered that Paulie is the betrayer, then we see Tom come home after his release from the Turk's clutches. There is more Brando footage which lengthens his stay in the film, but not much. The missing footage from 2 that has to do with Michael's story, is almost exclusively takes place during the wedding.. extra meetings, party scenes, discussions, ..including, and most importantly, locating and killing Fabrizio, the man who killed Michael's beloved Apollonia. The fact that this was left out at all is almost incomprehensible. Like I stated, there's more, but why spoil it all? The extra footage all adds to character development, story continuity, and action. It must have been very difficult for Coppola to decide what to leave in or out. People will only sit in a theater for so long. Or for that matter..to read a film review. So I'll close by saying one more thing..if your a Godfather fan..and you haven't seen this version...see it! You'll be in for a treat.

[-] Minimize Review

Report Abuse

Posted mar 27, 2008 3:41 am pt

Spider-Man

Agree (0)

Disagree (0)

Well, I'm a harsh critic of this one..primarily because I've been a Spidey fan all my life. I have every comic, and know the history backwards and forwards. I should say, first of all.. I liked the movie. After a bad television series, and a cartoon on Fox that was a little too hokey for it's own good..and years of waiting for this one.. ongoing stops and starts embroiled in legal hassles and the like..I have to say it was worth the wait. Let's take the pros first. McGuire was an excellent Peter Parker. Kirsten Dunst made a fine Mary Jane. The most inspired casting was Simmons as JJ Jameson. How perfect was that? Right down to the look, his Jameson almost stole the entire movie right up from everybody. And Aunt May is also perfect. Rosemary Harri's portrayal is sensitive to the role's needs, while just being modern enough to believe. Cliff Robertson as Ben Parker, would never have been my first choice, but he surprised me on this one. The role of Ben Parker, whoever short, is, aside from Peter, perhaps the most crucial role in Spidey's story. And the fact that Robertson came back to reprise the role two more times (for flashbacks!), says a lot for the actor. Much respect! Also, kudos for making the focus where it should be. Peter Parker, not Spider-Man. The mythos of the character and the story has always been how this change and the Spidey persona effect Peter and the lives and events around him, not the action of the Spider-man sequences. Anyone who disagrees was obviously never a fan of the book. Now onto the cons.. and top of the list..is the Goblin. Always one of my favorite villains, and the one I most wanted to see in a filmed Spider-Man story. However, although I understand his commercial value as the first villain.. from a story telling standpoint, it was the wrong choice. The appeal and mystique surrounding the Goblin has always been A: The fact that Norman Osborn is by nature a very powerful, dangerous and corrupt businessman who has a multi-national corporation at his disposal even without being the Goblin. .B: The fact that he is the father of Peter's best friend and C: The suspense of the cat and mouse game between Parker and Osborne due to the fact that both know each other's identities. A: Osborne is not the frighteningly powerful and corrupt entity that he was in the comic. He is depicted as being a brilliant (and rich) doctor who is a company head, and before the story is halfway over, he is booted from his own company? The story does not need this plot device for character motivation. The insanity and lust for power would have done just fine as a reason for Osborne's actions. And the power of his company would have made him an even more dangerous enemy. And what is the deal with the split-personality nonsense? In the comic, there was none of this. A couple of times, he faked amnesia to rest and re-group from his defeats, but was secretly always fully aware of who he was and his purpose. Now why did they alter the character that much? Because he was chosen as the first villain. There was no time to set up the character of Osborne strictly as Osborne. We had to move things along to get to the Goblin stuff, and besides...audiences with our sound-bite long attention spans wouldn't possibly be able to deal with two long origins, could they? But if they had chosen..let's say..Doc Ock? Look how great that worked for the second movie. Ock dosen't need as much prep, yet they got a great actor to play him, and UNLIKE the comic, gave us plenty of time to know Octavius before he becomes Ock. He would've been a great choice, and in the meantime, introduce Osborne, his company and his power, then in the third movie...POW! But..money talks, and they had to do Gobby first, and I think they lost a great opportunity. Closing the Goblin discussion, that was an awful costume! C'mon guys, you couldn't have done better than that? And some of Dafoe's dialogue.."We'll meet again, Spider-Man!"...oh, my God. Pa-lease! Willam Dafoe , while an exceptional actor, was the wrong choice for this roll. John Malcovich, the director's first choice, would've done much better. Dafoe is way too over the top. Want to know what Osborne should be like? Check out David Xanatos from Disney's animated Gargoyles series. Robbie Robertson is a great character from the comics who is terribly underused in these movies, as is Betty Brant. Again, the attention span thing. But this could've been corrected in later installments instead of giving us our umpteenth scene in which Dunst get's to be in danger and scream her head off! Honestly, the fact that MJ survives all three of these movies considering the dangers she's put in, is not only difficult to believe, it's impossible to believe! All that said, and taken for what it is, I still liked it. It is ashame though such an emotionally rich character and story was not given the depth and attention to character as say..the X-Men films. It was fun, and..like I said, certainly worth waiting for.. but this hero means so much to me. And with a few pen strokes, and a little more patience and planning, could have been so much more.

[-] Minimize Review

Report Abuse

Posted mar 26, 2008 1:56 am pt

Report Abuse

Posted mar 26, 2008 1:55 am pt