GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Tuesday, Nov 21, 2006

Well, I must admit that I had some inherent apprehensions about the new Bond film, not the least of which had to do with the choice of James Bond himself!! Following the relatively dismal performances in 'The World is Not Enough' and 'Die Another Day', it became apparent that Pierce Brosnan had, unbelievably, lost a bit of the 'Killer' touch that he effortlessly portrayed in 'Goldeneye' and 'Tomorrow Never Dies'. Brosnan must've seen it coming, but I guess the replacement was as much a shock to him as to anyone else. Well, atleast I was, shall we say, a bit 'dissapointed'. Because, although Pierce had certainly lost a bit of shine, he still put a lot into his roles and it was the script that ultimately led to the crappy performance of his last two films.

Daniel Craig didn't look the part for one. Previous Bonds have been known as much for their suavity as for the license to kill. This guy seemed to lack both at first glance. And, open minded as I am to change, the initial reactions to his appointment made me a bit, yes, 'apprehensive' about the prospects of Casino Royale.

The curiosity factor got the better of me and I found myself advance booking the tickets to the second day's show (Cause I had an exam on the day of the release). The movie, in a nutshell, was awesome right from the first scene....... an intense two-way dialog peppered with flashbacks of a gruesome fight scene was carried out perfectly. And  I didn't find Daniel Craig to be a least bit repulsive!! In fact his first impression was Rock Solid!! His intense eyes and his accent are perfect and his demeanor couldn't have been better.

'Mindblowing' seems like a small word for describing the first half of the film. From an incredible foot-chase to a thwarted plan to blow up an ailiner, everything confirmed one thing: this movie meant business!! The stroyline is based on a group of financiers who, led by Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen) are chief money-handlers for international terrorists. Mikkelsen was a perfect choice  for the part and plays out his character amazingly well.

The action comes to a complete halt during the mid of the film when the story takes an about turn from the action sequences to a high-stakes game of poker at Casino Royale that is organized by Le Chiffre himself to reclaim his lost fortune. And during all this, Bond becomes romantically involved with Vesper Lynd (Eva Green) who plays his financier for the gambling event. This involvement blossoms into a full-fledged love affair!! This puts a stamp on the fact that Mr. Craig is here to re-invent Bond, not to succeed Pierce Brosnan. The twist that follows stems from this very show of human emotion and vulnerability from the inpregnable and cold Mr. Bond towards the beautiful and 'complicated' Ms. Lynd. Although the twist is quite well done, the climax itself fails to match the hugely spectacular opening.

Overall though, the film exceeded my expectations by a mile and really managed to be a full-out entertainer. Daniel Craig does the job so well that instead of saying a teary-eyed goodbye to Pierce Brosnan, Bond enthusiasts will welcome the new hier with open arms!!

Category: Opinion
Posted by mYTH_2k4, 9:21am
26 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
Cool, I might see it soon.
Posted Nov 21, 2006 9:45 am PT
I'm glad you wrote a blog that wasn't about exams or your level this time I'm hoping to see it tomorrow
Posted Nov 21, 2006 10:04 am PT
Sweet, I'm gonna see it today.
Posted Nov 21, 2006 10:33 am PT
I couldn't watch it on the 17th because it's released in the regional language! Would you believe that?! Ah well, I'll wait for the English release.
Posted Nov 21, 2006 10:38 am PT
Heard it was a good movie. I'll probably see it when it comes out on DVD
Posted Nov 21, 2006 1:02 pm PT
Yeah I saw it and really loved it.........the first chase in Madagascar was amazing, IMO!!!
Posted Nov 22, 2006 1:56 am PT
Do post here as and when you guys see the film.......... we can have a discussion on the subject..........

@_Sam_: I told you I was gonna write some editorials or something as and when I'm free!!!
Posted Nov 22, 2006 5:53 am PT
I didn't like it that much. I think that the script sucked. There were too many flaws in the story
Posted Nov 22, 2006 4:57 pm PT
I really liked Pierce Brosnan as bond. He was slick
Posted Nov 22, 2006 6:44 pm PT
Yeah but he was being misused completely by the time Die another day arrived. This one was way better than the last 2 bond flicks. Even I miss Brosnan as Bond but I think Craig did a fantastic job in this film.

And I agree, the script does slow down in the second half and the climax isn't too great (as I've already stated)......... but all in all, I liked the movie.
Posted Nov 22, 2006 9:44 pm PT
I like James Bond as being slick, not so rough
Posted Nov 24, 2006 3:03 pm PT
You're kinda right when you put it that way, but I maintain that Craig was a fantastic choice.
Posted Nov 24, 2006 10:27 pm PT
noo!!! I must convert you into a Brosnan fan!!
Posted Nov 25, 2006 12:49 am PT
Hey I didn' t day that I didn't like Brosnan!! As a matter of fact I still think he's the second best bond ever........ following Sean Connery ofcourse.
Posted Nov 25, 2006 2:02 am PT
I like Brosnan as well but Daniel Craig did a swell job in Casino Royale...........
Posted Nov 25, 2006 6:56 am PT
Yeah.......... thats exactly how I feel..........
Posted Nov 25, 2006 11:21 am PT
There weren't any gadgets in the movie
Posted Nov 26, 2006 4:32 pm PT
I loved it, way better then the last two James Bond movies
Posted Nov 26, 2006 6:11 pm PT
Great to hear that!! Atleast you agree with me!!
Posted Nov 27, 2006 3:58 am PT
_Sam_ wrote:
There weren't any gadgets in the movie

Yeah I missed the gadgets as well............ but there are two reasons why they didn't include many in this movie:
1. They wanna reinvent te franchise.
2. Most Importantly: Austin Powers has been making a mockery of their gadgets (and pretty much everything else they do) since the very beginning of their own series........... so the bond makers had to cut back on stuff that they thought could easily be converted into something......... 'shaggedelic'!!!
Posted Nov 27, 2006 4:02 am PT
by hurting their fan base?
well there probably won't be another Austin Powers movie
Posted Dec 7, 2006 6:45 pm PT
Well Casino hasn't really hurt a lotta fans........... instead its doing quite well.

Why won't there be another Austin Power's movie?!?
Posted Dec 7, 2006 10:01 pm PT
Well, I guess this was a good entry for my FilmSpot account!!
Posted Dec 8, 2006 11:01 pm PT
I agree, I was just expecting at least R to be in it

the last austin powers movie ended strangely, so the script would be harder. plus, why make a sequal many many years later

true
Posted Dec 9, 2006 1:01 am PT
I've posted this blog as a review for Casino Royale........... I'll do a bit more film reviews now I guess!!
Posted Dec 23, 2006 3:00 am PT
that's great!!!!
Posted Dec 26, 2006 1:02 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • mYTH_2k4
  • Level: 1 (0%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 345
  • Messages Read: 0


advertisement

Friends

My Friends