GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Monday, Jun 8, 2009

Ok, the week of E3 is over. Fanboys are gasping for breath after all the announcements. The booth babes are going back to their normal lives, which involve things that were probably about 10x different then what they were subject to at E3. I think we can all safely say that Nintendo's keynote this year was much better than last year. Mainly because we actually got some game announcements to be excited about.

In our excitement, did we per chance miss out on subliminal messaging from Nintendo? According to this article from GamesRadar, there could be dark days ahead for us Nintendo faithful. So, should we be worried?

According to the GR article, the writer believes the release of Super Mario Galaxy 2 is a sign of Nintendo becoming complacent. Because Nintendo is making a direct sequel to a Mario game. In response, I would ask that the writer review some Nintendo history. Two Mario games saw sequels, Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels and Yoshi's Island. Both sequels are seen as quality releases, and I'm hoping Super Mario Galaxy 2 becomes the "Lost Levels" in terms of upping the difficulty. Miyamoto has claimed that the game will be much harder, so that's a good sign.

After E3, dare I say I'm more excited about the future of Nintendo. During the keynote, we received announcements for New Super Mario Bros., Super Mario Galaxy 2, and Metroid: Other M. Pre-E3, High Voltage announced two games that will be releasing within a year...Gladiator A.D and The Grinder. Oh, and post-E3 we just happened to receive a little concept art; confirming work is being done for a new Legend of Zelda game.

For the sake of argument, I will play a little devil's advocate here. Would I have liked to see a Star Fox game announcement, or Kid Icarus? Sure I would have. It would have been the bee's knees, but it didn't happen. Instead we got an announcement for a sequel to one of the greatest Mario games ever, an announcement for the first four player Mario game, and a Team Ninja developed Metroid game. If you look into Nintendo's past; they've blown away the amount of core titles released with the Nintendo Wii compared to past systems. Let's make a list of first party core titles that Nintendo has released since the Nintendo Wii has been in existence.

Mario Platformers - 1 Release (2 Pending)
Zelda Adventure Titles - 1 Release (1 Pending)
Punch-Out! - 1 Release
Mario Kart - 1 Release
Paper Mario - 1 Release
Super Smash Bros. - 1 Release
Metroid - 1 Release (1 Pending, perhaps 2 if you believe the Metroid Dread rumor)

We're now going into the third year of the Nintendo Wii. Meaning, we're just now reaching the halfway point (if you follow the five year console rule). I honestly can't remember the last time Nintendo released that amount of first party games in such a short period of time. Those numbers come close to the entire offering of the SNES, and I think it might surpass what they released on the Nintendo 64. Just imagine the library that the Nintendo Wii will see when its cycle comes to a close.

Here's some food for thought, would any of it had been possible without the success of the casual market? Think about it. Where is Nintendo getting all the money for releasing so many games? Do you think so many titles would be coming our way if the Nintendo Wii didn't branch out to a new audience? Trust me, when a game like Wii Fit sells close to 20 million copies the amount of resources being utilized in every aspect of the company increases. What I find funny is how so many people feel abandoned by Nintendo.

I mean how dare they branch out to a new market, and dominate the competition. How dare they bring new candidates into the world of video games, and expand the market. Just who do they think they are?

--They've sacrificed my much beloved Mario franchise (well, there's going to be 3 Mario platformers released within three years). Yea well, how about all the Zelda fans (umm there's guranteed to be two Zelda titles before the Wii is done). Hmm, well they've forgotten about some of their lesser known franchises (oh, you mean games like Punch-Out! which hasn't seen a release since the SNES). Well, they still suck and the Natal will blow them out of the water.--

Above, isin the block quote is a paraphrased conversation I had with someone in a gaming forum that I frequent. Everything not in the parentheses was something he said, and then of course everything in the parentheses was my response.

The gaming press just keeps adding fuel to the fire as well. For example, the Games Radar article I linked above. How can anyone honestly sit there and try to tell me they think that Nintendo is giving up on all its long time fans. It's kind of funny in a way, if it weren't so sad.

Oh well, I guess I'll just keep beating my head against the wall and be the minority voice in the gaming press. You know, the few who see through all the hardcore/casual dichotomy **** and realize Nintendo is just as faithful to its fans as they've always been. Who knows, maybe next year if Nintendo announces a Star Fox/Kid Icarus/Super Mario RPG/Super Mario Platformer/Zelda/Metroid/Punch-Out!/Donkey Kong/Wii Fit sequel Track & Field/Sin & Punishment third sequel/Excitebike/Super Metroid remix line up then everyone will shut up. It won't happen, but it is fun to dream isn't it?

Update: Apparently, not all Games Radar editors think alike. Henry Gilbert of GR wrote his own reponse to Hougton's thoughts on E3. Sounds similar to mine; great minds think alike I guess (I promise I didn't copy.. )

Article

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
You _can_ be disinterested in the Wii. It's possible. You ever wondered about that, maybe?

I got a Wii, and I can't really be bothered to care about any games announced (except maybe Metroid). And you know full well that none of those games will be released until late 2009 (probably not), and with Zelda, probably late 2011 or early 2012. What about Wii games _now_?

The Wii has great first party stuff, but I don't see much innovation from third parties, either. Sure, they have more third party support, but where are the big games? Where is Ubisoft, Square and the like? Oh, yeah, off making nimigame collections on the Wii while the 360 and PS3 get the real, big budget games. If you want to wag your Wii-mote around for hours, be my guest, but don't yell at other people for being disinterested.

Heck, if your definition of success is "Super Mario Galaxy, but harder" then I guess the Wii is a success. But for the rest of us, no thanks. Heck, that's not even good enough for the casual market. All they announced was the same old stuff they always do, which simply isn't good enough any more.

I agree with the article. Nintendo's arrogance is getting annoying, and the same-old same-old was already played out before the Wii came along.
Posted Jun 8, 2009 8:34 am PT
I'm confused...where's YOUR response to the article? At first I thought this entire blog was yours, then I clicked the article link and realized you just copied & pasted the whole thing to your blog. But I can't find YOUR response to the article...?
Posted Jun 8, 2009 9:56 am PT
@Aberinkulas - I'm not arguing that you "have" to like Wii games or not. I'm just sick of all this non-sense about how Nintendo has 'let us down' or something. They're releasing more first party titles than they have ever done so in the past. The numbers support that theory as well. I mean, I'm not telling you to like the Wii at all.

Feel free to stick to the Xbox 360 and PS3. They have some great games on those systems.

@Kravyn81 - The article I linked to at the bottom, was written by me. That's why I copy and pasted it. I just figured it was a read that my friends on Gamespot would be interested in reading. The Games Radar article that I mention in the post, is the article I'm referring to when I say "response".
Posted Jun 8, 2009 10:41 am PT
You do know there was a follow-up to that article right? : http://www.gamesradar.com/f/e3-09-mario-galaxy-2-shows-nintendo-wising-up-rebuttal/a-2009060411101951002

I love GamesRadar by the way, they write some of the funniest and well-written game articles on the net.
Posted Jun 8, 2009 11:00 am PT
@Paleo_Orca - Awesome, thanks for the find. That post didn't show up in my reader. It's a great response. I know I come off 'ranting' a bit in my post, but after reading the 100+ "Nintendo is leaving the core behind" responses to E3 I couldn't help myself.
Posted Jun 8, 2009 11:05 am PT
What amazes me is how many people complain about the Wii and the Nintendo first party games and yet there are a lot of good third party games everyone ignores and it's ashame because Zack and Wiki, No More Heroes, Little King's Story, Okami (ok it's a port), Boom Blox and de Blob are excellent games and all everyone cares about are shoot em ups and the big Nintendo titles. Everyone whined about how Nintendo didn't care about the hardcore so they're making two ACTUAL Mario games instead of just sports and parties, a new Metroid and a new Zelda that we know is in the works and you all still complain.
I'll quote Yahtzee again: "Fans are whiny clingy dipsh--s who will never EVER be greatful for any concessions you make and the minute you shut out their shrill, tremulous cries, the better off you are."
Also I love how everyone's hating on the two Mario games and yet no one mentions how Microsoft is milking the Halo franchises with TWO Halo spinoffs now.
Posted Jun 8, 2009 1:05 pm PT
Ah, OK. Thanks for clarifying. I actually find it ironic that before E3 most Nintendo fans were complaining about the lack of Mario, Zelda or Metroid games, and then when Nintendo finally delivers people are STILL complaining.

You can please some of the people some of the time and none of the people all of the time
Posted Jun 8, 2009 4:00 pm PT
@KBaily - that's an interesting thought you bring up about milking of franchises. I really think that the economy has a lot to do with it. Some of these games are seeing their beginning in what's known as one of the toughest times in economic history.

In such times you have to go with the sure money. Unfortunately, sure money generally doesn't come from taking chances and branching out. You have to stick with the old stand-bys. I honestly think we saw alot of that in all three of the conferences, in terms of the games. I mean at Microsoft's we saw Beatles Rock Band, Forza 3, The Halo games like you mentioned, MW2. At Nintendo we saw two Mario platformers, a Metroid game. At PS3's we saw GT5, GOW3, FF titles.

I really thought that all the games at the conferences were just continuations of series we all know. Not that it's necessarily a bad thing, as I can never get enough Modern Warfare, Mario platforming, and Final Fantasy.
Posted Jun 8, 2009 5:57 pm PT
The majority of games shown at E3 were continuations of favorite series because, even though we all don't want to admit it, that's what we want. The gaming media can go on and on about how they want more "innovation" and new IPs on the market, but the reality is we gravitate to what we're familiar with.

About the only new IP that got my interest was MS's Alan Wake. And I hope it succeeds. It's just too bad it's only on 360
Posted Jun 8, 2009 6:48 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • johnnyv2003
  • Level: 1 (0%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 410
  • Messages Read: 0


advertisement
Click Here

Friends

My Friends