This is the only PS3 game that I thought GS drastically under rated. When you take the fact that the average score for R&C Future with most game critics is 89 according to metacritic the GS score smells a little fishy. I wont say Aaron Thomas is an anti-Sony fan-boy maybe he just doesn't like R&C or platform games, either way he probably shouldn't have reviewed this game. I'm playing this game now and I think 7.5 is a very low score as well.

Aaron talks how the game has an identity crisis because of the mini games but I disagree. The core R&C gameplay is there and the mini games only pop up from time to time to break up the monotony. People slam other games for being too repetitive but when Insomniac does a good job of mixing it up a bit while at the same time keeping the core R&C gameplay as the meat and potatoes they get slammed?

Other people say R&C Future isn't revolutionary and it doesn't add a whole lot to the series or the genre. Lets be honest here you can say that about most games coming out today and that didn't stop people from giving games like Halo 3, Ninja Gaiden sigma, Bioshock, etc , etc, etc a high score nor should it.