Wednesday, Jan 18, 2006
I was bored the last couple days and so when I had some time I set up a couple old games.
Halo being one of them, I can't imagine why someone would pay for that game full price now, although I guess when it did come out a couple years ago it was different.
Being able to drive vehicles and **** was the way to go something different again I think at the time for FPS games.
Weapons were again just ok, and the aliens as well ranked in that. I haven't played Halo 2 and even though its been out for awhile, is it any better?
Send me a note and let me know.
The graphics have to be, as I thought the graphics in Halo were only average, but it was and like I said before average, and fun still.
A friend of ours at the iX house gameisgood.com was saying that he plugged in serious sam 2 and had a blast so that will be my next test, since there isn't really anything out there at the moment that I want to play.
Anyways, just a crappy post this time around.
Catch ya all on the flip side on my bulls eye!
Halo being one of them, I can't imagine why someone would pay for that game full price now, although I guess when it did come out a couple years ago it was different.
Being able to drive vehicles and **** was the way to go something different again I think at the time for FPS games.
Weapons were again just ok, and the aliens as well ranked in that. I haven't played Halo 2 and even though its been out for awhile, is it any better?
Send me a note and let me know.
The graphics have to be, as I thought the graphics in Halo were only average, but it was and like I said before average, and fun still.
A friend of ours at the iX house gameisgood.com was saying that he plugged in serious sam 2 and had a blast so that will be my next test, since there isn't really anything out there at the moment that I want to play.
Anyways, just a crappy post this time around.
Catch ya all on the flip side on my bulls eye!
Friday, Jan 13, 2006
I finished reading my good friend w0rm's review on F.E.A.R
Outstanding review. http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/fear/reader_review.html?id=240023
Check it out. I have to agree with what he says as well.
F.E.A.R. is the most likely the most underrated and under talked about game of 2005.
It is not getting enough dues in the gaming world. This game should be a monster.
I just can't get enough of it. Buy yourself a box of adult pampers turn the lights out, and crank the sound and go to town, remember, shhhh, you don't want to wake everyone up as your screaming like a little 12 yr old girl. =)
Now why couldn't Quake 4 be so entertaining? Raven you really disappointed me and a lot of other people, how could you have dropped the ball with such a established franchise?
Outstanding review. http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/fear/reader_review.html?id=240023
Check it out. I have to agree with what he says as well.
F.E.A.R. is the most likely the most underrated and under talked about game of 2005.
It is not getting enough dues in the gaming world. This game should be a monster.
I just can't get enough of it. Buy yourself a box of adult pampers turn the lights out, and crank the sound and go to town, remember, shhhh, you don't want to wake everyone up as your screaming like a little 12 yr old girl. =)
Now why couldn't Quake 4 be so entertaining? Raven you really disappointed me and a lot of other people, how could you have dropped the ball with such a established franchise?
Tuesday, Jan 10, 2006
Are there going to be any other games better then Quake 3 Arena or Unreal Tournament?
Were those the best that there was to offer?
Have the people that make up games lost the ability to use their imagination?
All of the games that come out are the same these days. When you buy the expansion pack, its like you just wasted another $25 bucks or so.
Does every first person shooter game have to have monsters that look like the ones for early Doom / Quake?
Is there not something else out there that can be eye catching? Is there anything left for games like BF 1942, COD, MoHAA and games alike. They really are all the same.
What would make a game much more unique then what keeps being put out?
Or as I asked earlier, is this all that there is? Or am I asking too much?
Were those the best that there was to offer?
Have the people that make up games lost the ability to use their imagination?
All of the games that come out are the same these days. When you buy the expansion pack, its like you just wasted another $25 bucks or so.
Does every first person shooter game have to have monsters that look like the ones for early Doom / Quake?
Is there not something else out there that can be eye catching? Is there anything left for games like BF 1942, COD, MoHAA and games alike. They really are all the same.
What would make a game much more unique then what keeps being put out?
Or as I asked earlier, is this all that there is? Or am I asking too much?
Some people just don't have opinions. Like iXGHOSTRIDER.
iXGHOSTRIDER must really love MovieTome and agree with every review we've ever written! What other reason could iXGHOSTRIDER possibly have for not rating a single film?


