GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Thursday, Oct 8, 2009

Funny People Launch Poster

In renowned Director Judd Apatows third feature film, Funny People, follows the character of George Simmons (Adam Sandler), a world famousstand up comedian who dabbles in cheap cash in comedies to scrape up extra cash. After learning he has a rare form of leaukimia, George delivers a dark stand up show and is later mocked on stageby genuinely un-funnyIra Wright (Seth Rogan). George later tracks down Ira and offers him a job as his secretary, hoping to finally have a strong friendship with someone before his life ends. However, the plot soon turns remarkably when George learns that the high level of Red Bull and Experimental Drugs he has been using have cured him of his disease, and he sees life in a new light. Ditching his B-Movie roles and slutty one-night-stands, George goes after the only women he ever truly loved, Laura (Leslie Mann). Problem is, she's now married to Australian husband Clarke (played by Aussie Eric Bana), but is their marriage as strong as they had hoped?

As you can probably tell by my synopsis, Funny People is by far Apatows maturist film yet, and he has really proven that in the pursuit of comedy, nothing is sacred to him. The plot of the film is very interesting, showing George sick then later George on the mend. However the two dont really click as Georges recovery was summed up quite quickly in a matter of minutes. However this isnt to major an issue and doesnt effect the plot to badly. What is a major issue is the films length. Funny People clocks in at almost 3 hours in run time, and it really doesnt need to be as it lingers to long on unimportant issues, like establishing Georges one-night-stands ( a ten minute scene ) but not enough detail on Georges afformentioned recovery. Im still trying to figure out why Apatow didnt cut down the film, as around 30% of the film is unfunny, like some cheesy speeches at a 4th of July Celebration. Probably the most memorable consistent sequences were the hit or miss stand up scenes and the celebrity cameos (with the likes of Eminem, Ray Romano, Andy Dick).

The rest of the film is pure Apatow humour, bizzarre but real. And both Adam Sandler and Seth Rogan are great in their roles, despite some gravelly tone from Sandler. Rogan does a great job at ditching his formerly gross reputation (which he unfortunately re-adopted for his role in the poorly made Observe and Report - ill have a review up for it soon) and makes Ira sympathetic. Eric Bana's role as the Aussie Clarke is great, and some of the films greatest scenes involve him in some way (refering to Australians as people who "Just Kill Things" was a strong joke). Leslie Mann brings a great level of charm on-screen, and its clear that Apatow didnt pick her just because of their marriage as implied in her cameo in The 40 Year Old Virgin. The banter between the always great Jonah Hill and the cocky Jason Swartzman is incredibally good as Ira's more successful roomates. There's even the very nice inclusion of Apatows daughters, seen very memorbaly in Knocked Up, and their acting skills are very solid.

In creating a more mature film Apatow has definately sacrificed some his trademark humour, which is the main problem in Funny People. The extended length and darker tones really make Funny People nowhere near as great as Knocked Up or The 40 Year Old Virginas it is much more of a dramady then a comedy (see what i did there?). Its a shame as if Apatow had cut it down and some some better editing this really could have been a comdedy great. It really is hard to recommend Funny People as a must see like other comedies, and whats even worse is that its very hard to recommend as a rental due to its long length and unfunny (at times) material. Overall, Funny People is a great idea on paper, however the execution is very poor leading to a very strong let down of a comedy. Probably the only thing that salvages Funny People from total mediocrity is the great acting and decent humour for the most part, although its still a waste of watching time by most stretches of the imagination unless your an absolute Apatow Fanboy and cant miss any of his work.

Overall : 3/5 stars.

Category: Movies
Posted by dijji497, 6:43pm
17 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
I refused to see this movie since it was 2.5 hours Thanks for posting anyway.
Posted Oct 8, 2009 7:58 pm PT
I really liked the film. Knocked Up and 40-Year Old Virgin are fun movies, but Funny People has some substance to it. 15 years from now, I doubt I'll be interested in seeing either of those other movies again (even now I'm not exactly eager to re-watch them), but I expect that I could see Funny People at different points in my life and take away different themes or insights each time. Even if it wasn't as well liked, I'm glad Apatow did it.
Posted Oct 8, 2009 8:30 pm PT
@Polybren - Thanks for commenting. I'm not saying I didn't enjoy the film, I just thought it was way to long and just not up to snuff like Apatows previous films. It was to much of a misdirection then his others ( not always a bad thing but annoying since from the trailers it looked like a much funnier film), I suppose is what I mean, and it would have been alot better recieved if his name didn't carry so much weight to it. My issues with the film were predominently to do with the films design choices (again, the length and certain unfunny scenes) then with the overall plot and depth. What did you think of the review?
Posted Oct 8, 2009 9:44 pm PT
@biggest_loser - maybe u could try the union thing again, just incase. What did u think of the review? Sorry I can't PM because I'm on my iPod mostly and it doesn't allow me to.
Posted Oct 8, 2009 10:07 pm PT
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
Posted Oct 8, 2009 11:44 pm PT
The review's a success in that it tells me what you expected going in and how the movie delivered (or didn't) on those expectations, which is all a reader can really ask for. I would have loved it if you'd gone more into some of the themes of the movie (I think it's absolutely hung up on notions of forgiveness, and the way each of the characters deals with that), but every reader has their own preferences about what questions they want answered. So definitely a good job on the whole. Beyond that, I'm a stickler for the little things and spotted a few typos and grammar flubs. If you want to improve your writing, treating it as professionally as possible will do wonders. All typos do is give readers an excuse not to think about what your actual points are. Hope that helps.
Posted Oct 9, 2009 12:47 am PT
Nice review mate, im gonna go see it probably.
Posted Oct 9, 2009 1:40 am PT
@biggest_loser-the review is better than ok mate, maybe you should consider the time and effort djji has put into the review. Keeps the negative thoughts to yourself.
Posted Oct 9, 2009 1:46 am PT
@Adz263 thanx LOL.
Posted Oct 9, 2009 1:51 am PT
@Polybren - thanx again and I'm working on improving them and making them more fine tuned, but i don't get a lot of time as I'm in Year8. And I do know it's not that bad compared to whats coming, but my class structure is wierd as I either get no homework or 4 assignments at once. Don't mean to fanboy out on you but I love your work on The Hotspot. McShea and Eckberg do need to learn to stop insulting other cultures though (Wales and Switzerland spring to mind).
Posted Oct 9, 2009 1:55 am PT
Very well writen, synopsis is great, great review!!
Posted Oct 9, 2009 4:20 am PT
never watched
Posted Oct 9, 2009 4:30 am PT
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
Posted Oct 9, 2009 6:09 am PT
@biggest_loser - I think hes pissed because you said the review was "...alright I guess". I dont type it on a word thingy, but I write it out first on paper and edit before I type it up as Open Office is a bad alternative to Word because it doesn't spellcheck. And gamespot has this glitch where it squashes my words together on it's own, so.......
Posted Oct 9, 2009 7:05 am PT
@infamous13579 - Ok........ Anything else to add?
Posted Oct 9, 2009 6:44 pm PT
@philosophy666 - What do you think about the review and the film?
Posted Oct 9, 2009 9:25 pm PT
@biggest_loser- you didn't really encourage him to keep trying lol, if you you need to tell him to work on something do so in a polite way. Besides your reviews are very similar to dj's in content...
Posted Oct 9, 2009 11:17 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • dijji497
  • Level: 1 (0%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 241
  • Messages Read: 0


Friends

My Friends