GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Saturday, Oct 17, 2009

Humans are social beasts. We thrive on communication, and feedback. However, we also thrive on gossip and information from secondary or even tertiary sources. This is why we're not journalists or news reporters. We're simply enthusiasts for the medium. Which is why, we can be misinformed very easily, when our hands are off the product. We are only going by what other people tell us.

HANDS OFF

The majority of us enthusiasts are not in the gaming press. So it's inevitable to bandwagon around the press' opinions as our own. Imagine if you will the analogy that we enthusiasts are represented as clouds, floating above the earth. We are just fluff. The earth is where the gaming press has their hands on concrete gaming evidence. Without concrete evidence, many variables can "cloud" our judgement. It's only when we have the game in our hands, can we become rain and hit the earth.

THE BARRAGE

Since the Internet, the climate of gaming has forever changed. Before with magazines, they'd be our only doors to news and information about the videogame scene. Now, everything you ever wanted to know about videogames is on the click of your fingers. So with more doors open to you at any point of time, you're bound to think that you can know everything about a videogame before it's out. You never have even touched the game, but with the amount of Internet outlets and press people's opinions, you can go off your sniff on what's good and bad.

Which is why many gaming companies realise this vulnerability, and are architects of their own games' coverage to such a high quality with trailers/screenshots/quotes. You can be misled by the culmination of hype from gaming websites and media, and feel like when the game's reviewed, want to let out your assumptions. You want to be the better on the horse race that your choice was right.

I KNEW IT!

In the game's review and release window, your opinion can finally come out the closet whether it is fan-gushing or hate-mongering. You think you've seen enough to form your own hands-off impressions. You also might feel inclined to spread your propaganda to other soapboxes, without ever having concrete proof. This is when you transform into a troll, and are there to either put the game on the pedestal or sink it under the ground without ever having a grain of truth. We are all victims of this (I'm currently an Uncharted 2 and Assassin's Creed 2 troll), because we want to seem smart and be centres of knowledge even if it's not first-hand. Pretention is an eventual side-effect of knowledge. You also want to be in on the act, before the hype for the videogame dies down after its first month (which is a sad case in itself).

MISLED BY THE PIPER

Not exclusive to reviews, news about games is in danger to gossip because of the ability of the Internet. It doesn't matter if the news story had a first-hand journalist behind it, now websites (Kotaku, Destructoid, and other blogging outlets) can throw around headlines around the story spread through secondary and tertiary sources. Commentators will comment on such "news", and spread that around so much that eventually it will stand as gospel "truth" (e.g. Gerstmanngate). There are now places where you can watch the whole game from beginning to end (Youtube, Justin.tv), without paying a dime.

This is the danger of the more avenues opened from the Internet, where there's less first-hand impressions and more reliance on analysts and footage. When you're relying on analyst websites, something has gone wrong, no matter how reliable they are. If you've heard/seen this much about a certain videogame, you'd think you know the whole caboodle?

THE EMPEROR WITH NO CLOTHES

Videogames are a unique beast of entertainment. They are interactive, through controller interfaces. Fortunately, no videos or reviews can tell you how your hands and brain would react when you're actually playing the game. No amount of discussing particular game mechanics or headless speculation on video websites can allow you to get the full dish on the game before it's released. None of these venues can sum up everything the game has to offer.

Unfortunately, you also can't convince sceptics of a game how good/bad it is, without handing them the game yourself. You could say "Brothers in Arms have some of the most emotionally brutal moments ever in a game!", but it means jack to the sceptic who hasn't touched the game. What might impress you about a game might not impress or even make someone else hate the game. You can't know every single secret hidden in a game that may give you an amazing moment, as evidenced by the recent Batman Arkham Asylum.

Really, who wants fanboys or trolls to fall flat on their faces for having the wrong knowledge about a game or being misled? Who wants these speculators to be made fools, post-release of a game? You have to sympathise with these gullible enthusiasts for letting hype and hyperbole take over them. So, who really wants these uninformed, hands-off humans to end up like the emperor with no clothes?

I do.

To conclude, what have we learned from this piece? What nugget of unpretentious knowledge can I impart to you? You shouldn't solely rely on websites or bloggers for your gaming purchases? Form your own opinion for once? That for opinions, everyone has their own and you should keep that in mind? No, you already know that by now.

The following advice might not be new to you, but it's a universal QFT (Quoted for Truth). Whenever a person starts going crazy over a game in a forum or comment, just say...

"HAVE YOU PLAYED THE GAME? IF NO, SHUT UP!"

Category: Editorial
Posted by digi_matrix, 9:45am
5 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
I've done this. I put a vid up on Youtube, a guide to firefight in ODST (Before it was released, showing the rules for it). Then people kept asking me loads of questions and the answers I gave were sort of half-true in the sense that I had heard about them and thought they sounded about right ...
Posted Oct 17, 2009 5:56 pm PT
QFT, baby! This might be one of the best blogs I've read all year. I couldn't help but notice that you don't have that lousy Soapbox emblem... you deserve it, BRAH!!!

I've recently been attached to System Wars a bit and this user posted something like, "lol at Wii owners saying they don't care that the game isn't AAA they like it anyway lol"

I told him that it's a healthy habit to form your own opinion and not worry about the score of a game. I know what's "AAA" in my book. GameSpot says Klonoa is a 7.5 but I say it's a 9.0 and not a soul in the world can tell me otherwise. Someone who hadn't played the game once told me it earned a 7.5 because it's simply elementary. I told him it was a 9.0 because it represented platforming to it's core.

Another example is Gears of War 2. I love the original (I say it's a 10), but the sequel sucks. I say it's a 7.0 (technically good, but compared to the original it's a letdown). It has a 93 average, GS says it's a 9 and every Xbox fanboy under the sun hates my review of it.
Posted Oct 18, 2009 12:01 am PT
And don't get me started on Metroid Prime 3. Probably my most hated sequel ever made. Where the original two were two of the greatest adventure games ever made, the third is a pathetic excuse of a game that only uses the Metroid name and the Samus character (you have to read my review to understand my gripes with it because there's so much). But every Wii fanboy will tell me that I'm a joke for saying that and that since I love Halo I simply cannot say that MP3 is a worse game because there's no way it can possibly be with it's 90 average score. But MP3 is a horrible punishment to dole out to fans, plain and simple, a horrible punishment to fans like me.

Again, these are my opinions. I formed them AFTER I played the games. A few years ago I learned not to be a victim of hype when I thought BioShock would be the greatest game ever made but it turned out to be nothing more than a corridor shooter with a nice atmosphere and story-telling method (not really story itself, but I like how it ties into the gameplay). It had potential and did not meet it all and I felt let down by it. So I just stopped and decided to give it a chance. Opinions are great when you know what you're talking about.

By the way, I've always wanted to be a cloud.
Posted Oct 18, 2009 12:03 am PT
And yet, if you make a reasonable opinion, perhaps based upon previous games by the same developer, or based upon your enjoyment/dislike of a particular particular genre, and then qualify that opinion with "I haven't yet played the game", I don't believe that modestly stating that opinion is bad and I would rather not be told to shut up.
For instance: I believe Dragon Age will be a lot of fun, because Bioware consistently makes a good product.
or: I played the demo of Darkest of Days, and it made me not want to buy this game because it seemed pretty bad.
Posted Oct 18, 2009 7:16 am PT
ThaSod wrote:
And yet, if you make a reasonable opinion, perhaps based upon previous games by the same developer...

I've been burnt out on games made by developers I trust. They can always make a stinker, just like movie directors. I probably shouldn't give examples, don't want to add more flames
Posted Nov 2, 2009 2:16 am PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • digi_matrix
  • Level: 4 (8%)
  • Rank: Robby the Robot
  • Forum Posts: 4124
  • Messages Read: 2325


advertisement

Friends

My Friends