GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Saturday, Aug 29, 2009

Usually i like most of the big games that everyone likes. I find it hard to pick a favourite since i like so many games my collection of ps3 games is almost at 40! but the game i have played the most would be LittleBigPlanet so i suppose that would be my favourite in a way. I have been looking through gamespot a lot lately maily because im trying to get them last 2% to level 26 but ive just been watching some old reviews and im starting to think i have bad taste in games

3 games that i have played and enjoyed this year were games that scored badly in reviews. First off i know reviews are just opinions of the reviewers but i just dont get how the the games 1 game more than the rest got such a bad review because i enjoyed it most of the 3.

First game is Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard. This game got a 6.0 on gamespot and an average of 5.3. not a terrible score i guess but its not good either. I got this game because it was 10euro new and i cant turn down a bargan. I started the game up and after the first level i was wowed the game itself wasnt exactly the best made thing ever visuals were a bit plain and it didnt look realistic but it was seriously funny and it had a great cover system nothing like ive seen in other games. i really enjoyed it and i didnt expect it to score what it did.

Second is Terminator Salvation which got a 5.0 on gamespot 4.7 average critic score. Now i know those of you who havnt played this game will be laughing because nothing but bad has been said about this game but i really enjoyed playing it. It looked quite good and the story was good too but then again anything with a terminator in it is cool. The game is a lot of fun to play it also has a handy cover system but not as good as matt hazards. I think this game deserved a 6 because it is a good fun game the devs just got a bit lazy or whatever but its still good fun

And last is Godfather 2 which got a 4.5!!! on gamespot a friggen 4.5! thats terrible like terminator got 5 and this is a way better game. I played the game and thought it was great i had a ball playing it. I loved how it was so like and so different to GTA. I found building up the whole empire was great fun. Like Matt Hazard it suffered from a few bugs and the visuals werent exactly cutting edge they were a bit plain but this was also a geat game and i cant understand how it was given a 4.5 it deserves more than that.

This was my favourite of the 3 games and it also got the lowest score which is why i ask do i have bad taste in games?

Category: Games
Posted by d_ano, 4:49am
6 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
woo this post gave me the 2% i needed!!
Posted Aug 29, 2009 4:54 am PT
To each his own I say. Just play whatever is fun for you and ignore everyone else.
Posted Aug 29, 2009 7:06 am PT
the first step in development of taste is to be willing to credit your own opinion. There's no need to follow other's precedents.
Posted Aug 29, 2009 7:35 am PT
Not bad taste per se, just different I guess. Bad taste is if you like playing the new Leisure Suit Larry.
Posted Aug 29, 2009 12:45 pm PT
there not such thing as bad taste,i love the da vinci code game and it is poorly rated.Is like in the movies some people love comedy other dramas.Think it this way if all like the same thing it would be a boring world.
Posted Aug 30, 2009 10:36 am PT
suppose they are good points. reviews can be trouble in a way so. tis a shame most of the lower rated games dont get demos so people can get a go and decide for themselves. i hope ea didnt mean it when they said no more godfather games.
Posted Aug 30, 2009 11:00 am PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • d_ano
  • Level: 1 (23%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 153
  • Messages Read: 0


advertisement

Friends

My Friends