Friday, Feb 6, 2009
So yeah the other day I finally caught up with the rest of the Wii owners and got around to playing Super Mario Galaxy. It was an extremely fun game but the major flaw was that for people who didn't want to collect all the stars it was a very very short game. They could have added a lot more to add to the playing time. So after about 6 hours I was done with the game. So.. overall I was a bit disappointed with it because of such a low amount of playtime. Overall I'd probably give it a......
9.0
-bobcheeseball
Comments
Page
1
« prev
|
next »
Posted Feb 6, 2009 8:00 pm PT
Yeah, but collecting the rest of the stars was worth it.
Posted Feb 6, 2009 9:05 pm PT
low amount of playtime? you dont know what you're missing by not catching all 121 (yea theres more 120 with luigi after you get 120 with mario and then you unlock a new stage). you cant call a game "short" because you only played half of it
Posted Feb 7, 2009 5:33 am PT
I agree. The main story was short, but very good overall..
Posted Feb 7, 2009 6:33 am PT
Well I don't know but the main thing to do in a mario game is to get all starts and stuff I think.... I thouh it was a pretty good game even without that, also the porwer ups are kewl.
Posted Feb 7, 2009 10:39 am PT
I agree its short. But I still think its one of the best Wii games there is. And thats a very short list.
Posted Feb 7, 2009 3:29 pm PT
Congratz!
Posted Feb 7, 2009 9:32 pm PT
It took me 2 weeks to fully beat that game with Mario and Luigi and get the 121st star with both of them. I'd say it's too easy, except on the Mario retro NES stage where you collect all of the purple coins. they should have gave it different difficulties.
Posted Feb 9, 2009 4:19 pm PT
Page
1
« prev
|
next »
Friends
My Friends
Kaijin1