(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
(SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALET SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT)
When I first heard who won the overall prize at the video game baftas, I was a bit confused. I mean, Super Mario Galaxy as the best game?!?!?! In my opinion that did NOT deserve to win, not at all, ok it is a good game, bette than a lot of other games, but it isn't good enough to win the overall best prize, over other great games, Call of Duty 4 and 5, LittleBigPanet, they all won awards, but for people to think that Super Mario Galaxy is better than them? For me, what i heard was very disappointing.
