GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Friday, Dec 3, 2004

I learned about an enormous amount of things in the 2004 election. This was the first election that I actually followed very closely. At work I would listen to political radio commentary all day. For some reason, I just found myself glued to any information regarding the two candidates. When the election first started, I found myself completely for John Kerry. As the year went on, I started to realize that I don’t really like the idea of either one of these candidates running the country. When I sit down and honestly think about it, I think the most important thing I learned during this election is not to make up my mind so quickly before hearing what all the candidates have to say. At some point during the election, I managed to give both guys a clean slate. Meaning I was no longer saying my vote is going to Kerry.

I thought the entire campaign was unnecessarily ugly. Both sides had negative tactics and ad campaigns. Suddenly this election wasn’t about doing what’s right. It was about beating the other guy. Kerry had an easy target. He could attack Bush for a war that most of America disagreed with. Bush’s only real response was to defend himself by bringing up the intelligence that gave him the information of mass weapons of destruction in Iraq. From there, Bush’s only tactic was to go after Kerry’s record. When all the arguing was over, you realize that Bush wasn’t doing a terrible job as president. He just wasn’t doing a great job. Kerry attacked Bush for jobs, debt, illegal aliens, etc. Half of which America saw coming before Bush. I can remember hearing that we were entering a recession before him. The other half maybe responsible for the use of the National Guard in Iraq. So when you stop and think about it, the Iraq war is really the only target at this point. Once you listen to other major offerings that Kerry has if he obtained presidency, weren’t really what people saw as the most important thing to take care of. One example was healthcare, and his plan to allow people to choose their own doctor. I think people realized if you’re wanting to decrease the national debt, perhaps we shouldn’t be considering new programs. Especially since the country is in a slump.

Once all the cards are laid out on the table, you realize that whether you see the war as a mistake or not, that it may not be wise to switch presidents at a time when you’re trying to setup elections and clean up a possible mistake you made in Iraq. Kerry didn’t offer any revolutionary tool that would justify changing a president at an important time. This is what was the most important thing that I learned during this election. I can’t make up my mind so early. I don’t like Bush. I don’t like what he has done while he’s been in office, but I think changing the president at this point in time might have resulted in some extra problems. It doesn’t matter if you like or dislike someone, all candidates must receive the fair amount of attention that’s owed to them, because they’re two sides to every story as the saying goes.

Posted by ThE-JoKeR, 11:16pm
3 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
Woah, political radio and programming in the States helped you formulate a non-biased opinion? That's outstanding. The blatantly biased crap that goes on the airwaves in your country makes me cry inside. Get CBC or possibly even the BBC. Both own.

Anyways, I agree with you about the candidates. They both suck. I'm a right wing leaning person, but when I say that I mean I'm in favour of economic conservatism, not social conservatism like Bush. Bush is more worried about what's "right" and morals then he is about the economy, which is insane. That's why I say Arnold Schwarzenegger should be the next Republican president. He's a Republican, yes, but he's in a totally different class of conservatism then Bush is. He's the only good economic conservative in the country who has any power of the people. He says he backs the president, but then looking at what he does with California (like fixing it) isn't something you'd expect from a Bush type. Maybe he's not the best economic conservative out there, but he's the best known one. People would back him. Ammend your constitution damnit. Make him president!
Posted Dec 4, 2004 11:31 pm PT
You must have stabbed yourself in the eyes when they raised the limits of the budget a week or so ago. As for the political commentary on the radio, I usually listen to Boise talks live, O'reilly radio factor, Michael Savage (who is gut-wrenchingly insane at times, but occasionally worth listening to), and Sean Hennedy who recently came to BSU. I personally can't stand him. I think it's good to have a two party system, but if you differ with Hennedy on anything he'll smack you around. I still don't even understand why he came to BSU for a seminar. Even though Idaho is a modified one-party state (republican), what age group do you think is most likely to be liberal? Of course young college students. It's almost like he's come on behalf of the republican party to persuade future voters.

My honest opinion about Bush is that he's definitely not conservative. I would honestly say he's more tilted to being a liberal than anything else. I honestly can't imagine either of the democratic and republican parties saying that these two men were the best they had. If that really was the best, maybe we should be looking at Nader and his green party, because I can't even imagine the future they're seeing.
Posted Dec 5, 2004 12:32 am PT
While its not really ideal to change presidents in a time of war, I believe in this case we should, for a number of reasons. First, a lot of people that have an affect on the war in Iraq are actually IN Iraq and would not change position if Kerry won the election. So, Bush didn't really do a whole lot in Iraq, besides start it, and in the future, the President only has so much lee-way in his decisions, so it doesn't matter too much who is in office.

Second, I can't vote for a president who is against gays, abortion, and stem cell research. I dont like Bush's evanglist attitude and I dont like how he brings his Christian ideals into governing my country. In terms of social issues, I hate Bush with all of my soul because being against gay marriage makes no sense to me, especially when the only argument against it, has to do with Christianity.

Third, still being in school, I care a lot about laws that affect schools, most specifically, the No Child Left Behind Act, which I consider a horrible piece of legislature. Requiring more standarized tests only encourages teachers to "teach to the test" instead of having reasonably intelligent class conversations about the curriculum. Basically, it takes away from my learning, and makes me hate the public school system even more.

I dont really care if Kerry changed his view on the war, because 2 years ago was a totally different time. So, Kerry's alleged "flip-flop" attitude does not bother me. After all, I would rather have a leader who doesn't know whether to do right or wrong, than a leader who always done wrong.
Posted Dec 5, 2004 1:55 am PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • ThE-JoKeR
  • Level: 1 (0%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts:
  • Messages Read:


advertisement

Friends

My Friends