GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Saturday, Aug 8, 2009

I played through San Andreas again recently. This is, what, the twentieth time? Nah, more than that. Anyway, after playing through San Andreas again, I decided to pop in the GTA IV disc. Boy, that game has not aged well.

Yes, a game that game out in 2004 has aged gracefully, and a game that came out last year by the same developer in the same series has not. Why? Let me break it down:

GTA IV was amazing the first time I played through it, I'm not going to lie. After I beat it, I felt no urge to replay it. San Andreas was amazing the first time I played it, too. After I beat it, I immediately wanted to replay it. In the time that I've had GTA IV, I've beaten it once, and gotten part-way though it once. Also in that time, I've beaten San Andreas twice, and gotten part-way though it twice. Oh, and I'd had San Andreas for three-and-a-half years before that.

With GTA IV, Rockstar North just tried too hard. The graphics are amazing, and the interaction between the characters is great. But Niko moves way too slowly, and when he gets in a car, he can't drive at all. Maybe it's just me, but these aren't realistic driving physics. Barely tapping the gas shouldn't make you spin out uncontrollably. Luckily, you can just hop in a taxi and go wherever.

With San Andreas, Rockstar North did an amazing job. The graphics are very good, and I prefer them to GTA IV's, because they're not as dark and dreary. The characters are generally better (okay, San Andreas doesn't have Brucie, but, no matter how awesome he is, he's only one character), and you grow to loathe the people who have betrayed you, unlike GTA IV, where you're just like "wat". CJ moves at a perfect pace, and handles everything except stairs like a human being. The driving physics are fun; you actively want to drive around. Sure, you have to drive everywhere, but who cares?

In GTA IV, Rockstar North got rid of the RPG elements of San Andreas. Dude, I loved those. When CJ got full muscle, I felt a sensation of pride. I don't care if it's a sin; my fingers hurt, but I did it. Now to work on stamina! Then maybe my MP5 skill, so I can move whilist shooting! In GTA IV, you have none of that. I hope you like how Niko handles; he's not going to get any better!

Also, I'd rather have Denise or Millie calling me saying I haven't been paying attention to them every few hours than Roman wanting to go BOWLING, play POOL or DARTS, or even SEE BIG AMERICAN BOOBS! Boobs are great, don't get me wrong, but I can live without pixelated ones.

All in all, San Andreas is a much better game. It chose fun over realism, something all games should do. After all, isn't that why we play videogames?

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
I agree with you on all aspects of this rant. My San Andreas broke so I didn't get a new one, I borrowed my friends one. I've always said that GTA IV is TOO realistic for a video game and I got bored of it half way through whereas I carried on playing San Andreas. Good rant.
Posted Aug 8, 2009 9:22 am PT
My favourite GTA game is Vice City, but many of your points would be the same for that game. I hate that GTA IV tries to be so realistic
Posted Aug 8, 2009 11:00 am PT
Vice City was great, too, but I didn't want to stretch the rant too far.
Posted Aug 8, 2009 11:34 am PT
so inspirational
Posted Aug 15, 2009 2:58 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • Teh_Jakester
  • Level: 1 (45%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 1154
  • Messages Read: 0


advertisement

Friends

My Friends