GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Friday, Jan 23, 2009

Best Picture:

Predicted Winner: Slumdog Millionaire

Best Actor:

Predicted Winner: Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler)

Best Actress:

Predicted Winner: Anne Hathaway (Rachel Getting Married)

Best Supporting Actor:

Predicted (hoped?) Winner: Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight)

Best Supporting Actress:

Predicted Winner: Marisa Tomei (The Wrestler)

Best Director:

Predicted Winner: Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire)

The rest are largely unimportant. The technical awards will probably be mostly taken by Benjamin Button, and Wall E as animated feature is a lock

Now, a rant, one you all probably saw coming and it's really my own f**king fault for giving into the overall consensus and not keeping with my pessimistic nature. The Dark Knight snub. And yes, it was a snub. Every guild had shortlisted it on their best film lists, the critics all listed it on their end of years list and the common belief among Oscar watchers was that it would be nominated. Instead, the Academy showed their true colours, by instead picking a film with no momentum in The Reader. Honestly, it appears these jokers pick only based on how Oscar worthy they look and the subject matter they tackle as opposed to actually basing the noms on merit. And in this regard, a film about a man running around in a batsuit was hardly going to get nominated ahead of Another Important Holocaust Movie, no matter how relevant or mature the themes presented. It would appear that the genre of superhero movie will never be seriously considered by the Academy. And don't give me that crap about Watchmen possibly having a chance. Batman was always the material that could best be translated into an best picture worthy film and even the best possible effort wasn't enough. They didn't even nominate the most consistent director of modern times (and my Film Person Of The Year) Christopher Nolan. The man is way past his due. Oh well, if he sets Batman 3 during WW2 maybe his has a chance next time round. With this debacle, the apparent certainty that Ledger would win Best Supporting Actor is also on shaky ground. Nothing seems certain anymore. Still, at least the Academy can now never take the film from us. Their nomination of it for Best Pic would have been largely to service their own benefits, and boost ratings. Now instead of being an exercise in elitist backslapping, it remains the fans' films, as it was always intended to be. Years from now, most of those Oscar nominated films will be long forgotten, but The Dark Knight's legacy with remain undiminished and outlive them all

Also, even though it was slightly overrated, The Wresler got a raw deal. It deserved a Best Pic nom. And Best Director. And why the f**k did Bruce Springsteen not get nominated under best original song for The Wrestler. And, the standout score of the year in TDK score was ignored. It deserved the nom just for the fantastic theme Zimmer dreamt up for The Joker. Disturbing and unsettling

So yeah, the Academy is a f**king shambles. No changes then

Peace. I'm off to listen to the new Springsteen album

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
Oscars kind of suck. Last year, i think i ever heard of 3 movies with some kind of award in the big 8 categories.
Ledger will win,but its a shame that it took his death in order to bring major attention to tdk, which really is ingenious, although as a batman fan, i may be more than a bit biased.
Posted Jan 23, 2009 7:40 pm PT
Oscars= Piss stain. I bet Dee came when he saw that Sh*tdog had been nominated for everything under the sun. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, but still...The Wrestler deserved a BP nom. If Mickey Rourke and Heath Ledger don't win their categories, I will start a riot.
Posted Jan 23, 2009 8:40 pm PT
Dude, the Oscars have been a joke the last couple of years. The trophies always seem to go to the unworthy movies, like Crash. Did you see that piece of sh*t, I couldn't believe that it beat Brokeback Mountain.
Posted Jan 23, 2009 10:58 pm PT
I thought Crash was a good movie.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 1:03 am PT
I agree that sometimes oscar goes to movies that or none know about it or its nothing compare with the other that is compiting some oscars are like dessapointing sometimes anyway

XO XO

Posted Jan 24, 2009 5:02 am PT
I am a huge Star Wars fan.....I was hoping more from that academy with Ep. 3. Most important NOMINATION was make-up for Palpatine

TDK got 8 nominations, 7 of them middly important, like editing, direction on editing and stuff. I'd like to see one of those a$$holes doing Christian Bale's Batman voice. I loved Caine on TDK! and nothing! sh!t.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 6:24 am PT
i'll be surprised if Slumdog Millionaire doesn't win everything
Posted Jan 24, 2009 8:33 am PT
The academy was been sh!t this entire decade.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 3:52 pm PT
Same thing happened last year with Zodiac and so many films before it. The Academy has a long history of getting things wrong. Citizen Kane lost to How Green Was My Valley back in 1941.

As disappointing as it can be, you gotta take everything the Academy does with a grain of salt. I mean, Kevin Costner has won Best Director. Does that mean he's a better director than Christopher Nolan, Orson Welles, Ridley Scott, David Lynch, David Fincher, Spike Lee, Alfred Hitchcock, Brian De Palma and the greatest director of all time Stanley Kubrick? Heck no.

Acting is the same. Nicholas Cage has won a best actor award so does that mean he's better than Clint Eastwood, Peter O'Toole, Johnny Depp and DiCapprio? God no.

Unfortunately the Academy has always been in shambles and it's probably not gonna get any better any time soon.

I have to admit I was pretty pissed about the Bruce Springsteen snub. The Dark Knight one I expected but snubbing The Boss is so not cool. Especially since they only have 3 nominees and usually they have 5. Seems like they did that on purpose. Sally Hawkins not getting nominated was disappointing as well but she got the Golden Globe so whatever.

I think your predictions are pretty good except I think Fincher will get Best Director, Kate Winslet for Best Actress and Penelope Cruz for Supporting Actress. But that's just a guess on my part.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 3:54 pm PT
And as for Nolan being way past his due, there was 33 years and countless worthy films before the Academy finally honored Scorsese and to a lesser extent just about three decades before they gave Polanski his award so be prepared for a long wait.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 4:19 pm PT
shadow- Ok, maybe I was a little too hard on Crash, but I still think that Brokeback Mountain should have won.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 5:02 pm PT
I freaked out when I saw that The Wrestler had been snubbed in favor of The Reader. Everything about the movie was incredible. Ben Button has also received mixed reviews from critics and everyday people alike. I think this year, the very best got their nominations in each category (Slumdog for BP and BD, Mickey Rourke for BA, etc.), but there were a few snubs. Best picture should have traded out The Reader and Ben Button for The Wrestler and TDK. And Shadow said I could make my own online rules so...Rule #1: Everything Shadow says about movies will be laughed at and not taken seriously. Especially after Slumdog bored him, since I saw it for a 2nd time last night with four other people and every last one of them loved it and says it's their favorite of the year now (with only one of them knowing it is mine as well).
Posted Jan 24, 2009 5:22 pm PT
And Shadow I did nothing when I saw that Slumdog had been deservingly nominated for so much because I knew it was coming already.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 5:23 pm PT
The day anyone takes anything I say about movies seriously will be the day we wake up in the world from Idiocracy. If you haven't seen it, go get the DVD.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 6:03 pm PT
I don't quite understand the boner you yanks seem to have for Slumdog. Don't get me wrong, I loved it but the consensus here among the populous has been mixed, wheras every critic in the States has been falling over backwards to praise it and the crowds seem to universally love it.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 7:53 pm PT
Dee- My mum went to see Slumdog, she thought it was a great achievement in film terms but reckoned Danny Boyle let himself go a bit when it came to the portrayal of the slums in India.


Plus you Dee Radiohead Syndrome-d it to me even from the beginning.
Posted Jan 24, 2009 8:33 pm PT
I'm a yank and I have no boner for Slumdog. It was decent, but nothing that special.
Posted Jan 25, 2009 1:52 pm PT
Dee's fanboy hype is the reason I haven't seen Slumdog Millionaire yet, and why all the women in my village were raped by vikings.
Posted Jan 28, 2009 5:35 am PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • RoboAmish
  • Level: 1 (13%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 860
  • Messages Read: 60


advertisement

Friends

My Friends