GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Thursday, Mar 2, 2006
MIA EDITORS

An editor is considered MIA if they have not been active on the site for over 30 days and/or submissions in their editor's queue have been pending for more than 3 days (for a show on our Top 20 List,) or more than 7 days (for a show NOT on the Top 20 List.) Any submissions left unmoderated longer than the deadline may be moderated by TV.com staff. Inactive editors who have not logged into the site for 30 days or longer may be force-retired from their guide(s), regardless of whether or not there are new subs in their queues. This is to ensure that editors are active and ready to moderate submissions whenever they come in.

If you need to report an editor as MIA, send a PM to this profile. You must include the following information:

• username in the Subject Line
• ID of the guide(s)
• specific reason(s) for why you are reporting them as MIA.

The ReportMIAEditor inbox will be checked every Wed. and Friday. We will not issue responses from ReportMIA but you will recieve a PM from staff letting you know the outcome of the investigation. Staff will NOT discuss the details of the investigation.

Each MIA case will be considered unique, and staff may use some discretion in regards to the amount of submissions pending in the editor's queue, how popular the guide is, the editor's history with the guide, etc.

Any editor receiving a warning MUST respond to the warning PM as soon as possible with an explanation. Failure to respond within 7 days to any MIA warning will result in automatic retirement from the guide in question. The ReportMIAEditor inbox is checked daily. We will not issue responses from the ReportMIAEditor account but if necessary, you will receive a PM from staff letting you know the outcome of the investigation. Staff will NOT discuss the details of the investigation. As editors are given time to reply to the warning, it is not necessary to spam the ReportMIAEditor account with multiple PMs regarding the same editor. Doing so is counterproductive and may weaken your complaint.

Special Circumstances

If you are an editor and you know that you will be unavailable to edit your guide(s) for a set period of time, you can PM staff member nilla_chelle01 or post the details regarding your absence from TV.com in the pinned Editor Special Circumstances forum thread in the Ask the Editors forum. If you give us this courtesy beforehand, staff will check your queues for you during your absence. This will also ensure that you will not be considered MIA and not be retired from your guide(s).

Sometimes unplanned emergencies occur, and editors might not be able to log in and process their queues. All editors must keep in mind that any unreported absences and/or any submissions left unmoderated for 7 days might garner an MIA report. If an editor has a reason why certain submissions were not cleared within the 7 day time period, they must contact staff member nilla_chelle01 as to why or else risk an MIA report. Staff can't readily guess why an editor is missing or why submissions are left in the queues. But if submissions are backlogged, and users must wait longer than a week to get their submissions processed, then it is in the best interest of the site to retire the missing editor so that another, more active user can take over. Great care and investigation goes into the decision to retire an editor based on MIA reports. As a result, once an editor is force-retired from a guide, they cannot be reinstated, and requests to revert editorships will not be honored.

An editor will receive up to 2 warnings from TV.com Staff regarding MIA status before they are retired. Any editor receiving a warning MUST respond to TV.com Staff as soon as possible with an explanation. Failure to respond within 7 days to any MIA warning will result in automatic retirement from the guide in question.

**Please do NOT post any part of an MIA editor report as a comment on this blog. It will be deleted. Thank you.

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
Posted Mar 27, 2006 4:47 pm PT
Are you actually doing anything about these MIA editors for which I've sent you PMs about? If so, please PM me; thank you.
Posted Jun 24, 2006 10:08 am PT
I have sent a few in the past months and havent been opened! Whats up with that?
Posted Jul 1, 2006 1:24 am PT
If you include the editor's user name in the subject line of the PM (as required), there is often no need for the staff to open the message. This helps them to get through more MIA reports in less time.
Posted Jul 3, 2006 4:51 pm PT
Come on, homes. No need? That doesn't make sense. Why are we asked for "specific reasons" as to why we're reporting them? I think this is just like that thread for reporting the screwed-up drop down menus for adding new episodes. Save them all up for about 4 months and then start dealing with them.
Posted Jul 3, 2006 10:13 pm PT
What is a reasonable amount of time for a PM reply? The editor I'm missing hadn't been on for over a month, then was on for one day and didn't touch my part of his queue. Right now you guys are working away at the queue, but it's over 12 days old. Do I have to send a PM if it's almost 10 days since he's been on? I mean, most editors post that they're going to be gone, this one seems to have vanished into the ether. Thanks for any suggestions you have.
Posted Jul 31, 2006 6:20 am PT
Well, when my subs are pending for at least 7 days.
I check their profile.
If they have not been on in at least 7 days (let-alone checking their Q, but actually not being on in 7 days) then I PM them or leave a message in their Blog, if it's relavent.

BUT, if they've not been online in weeks, I just leave the PM and report them as MIA!
Posted Aug 6, 2006 10:59 am PT
I sent you a PM...
Posted Aug 6, 2006 11:35 am PT
Thanks Kraig, that at least gives me a reference point! Of course, it's 7 days since a moderator or staff have signed into this account... hmm.
Posted Aug 7, 2006 7:07 am PT
If the editor hasn't logged in since March 2nd, do you think that he'll come back in the next week? Not likely.
Posted Sep 1, 2006 7:16 pm PT
Hmm.. Looks like ReportMiaEditor would be MIA if it had a guide. Not been on in 2-3 weeks.
Posted Sep 8, 2006 9:01 am PT
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
Posted Sep 26, 2006 8:47 am PT
Lets see...how do we report the ReportMIAeditor, MIA?
Posted Sep 26, 2006 8:48 am PT
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
Posted Sep 30, 2006 6:42 pm PT
Look somebody actually signed on!!
Posted Oct 10, 2006 6:02 pm PT
Thank you so much for the new guidelines.
Posted Nov 22, 2006 1:20 pm PT
The editor I've reported hasn't been on since the begining of October. I had submissions pending for one of their guides for over a month before the staff looked them over.

I just reported them MIA a few minutes ago. I mean come on, if you haven't been on in over a month and have given no reason, then you lose.

I have to wait a while before reporting another possible MIA. It's only been a couple of weeks, for this user.
Posted Nov 27, 2006 6:26 pm PT
I Sent a PM about a month ago and i have heard nothing about it.... and the user still hasnt been online!!! shouldnt the staff at least tell me whats happening.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 10:51 am PT
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Posted Feb 12, 2008 12:53 pm PT
I'd get rid of the "up to 2" warnings. Make it a solid 1 or 2, (or if you mean something like 2 for the first time and 1 for subsequent investigations, say so). Either way, the more precisely you spell it out, the better for everyone I think.
Posted Mar 15, 2008 4:47 am PT
Can the ReportMIAeditor also take editors who are not moderating the forums?
Posted Apr 27, 2008 6:22 pm PT
I think editors really only HAVE to moderate submissions, heylin_prince.
Posted May 5, 2008 11:40 am PT
It has been 7 days since I submitted 4 items that have yet to be moderated. While 7 days is not quite over the deadline, I see that it's been fully 7 weeks since the editor last logged on (May 26). Will someone else moderate them?
Posted Jul 14, 2008 2:53 pm PT
I'm sure that this page once invited reports on rogue and incompetent editors, but that reference is no longer contained in the blog. What process should we use to report concerns about troublesome editors?
Posted Jul 21, 2008 5:11 am PT
Yeah, there's an editor I'm trying to replace that accepts every submission that comes along (except mine!) even if it's written in text messaging, uncapitalized, ungrammatical shorthand and reads like an opinion that should posted in a forum thread! x( She has absolutely no standards, no presence in the forums, and does a terrible job with the guide! Being MIA is the least of her sins, but that seems to be the only thing we can report right now.
Posted Jul 26, 2008 2:32 am PT
why does the MIA Editor profile list pushing daisies as one of its favourite shows?
Posted Aug 16, 2008 2:05 am PT
So whats the deal? Is the ReportMIAEditor inbox checked twice weekly or daily? The above blo gives conflicting information...
Posted Oct 9, 2008 11:28 pm PT
For those of you wondering where to report editor problems unrelated to submissions moderation, I believe the appropriate place is to PM the "ProblemEditor" profile.
Posted Feb 7, 2009 10:09 pm PT
dcw1980 Editor has not been on the site since October 2008 and I want to make some submissions to one of his shows please?
Posted Sep 2, 2009 6:59 am PT
does anyone know where you report an editor who is there but not doing there job and just allowing all sumbissions
Posted Oct 26, 2009 10:25 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • ReportMIAEditor
  • Level: 1 (2%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 1
  • Messages Read: 0