Since I joined just over a week ago I have been mainly working on person guides. Now alot of those had no editor in the first place so i obtained them quite easily.

So far I have attempted to go after two guides with editors already in place. The first was on the guide to Kiefer Sutherland, in which the editor was extremely helpful and added the information I added because he wanted to the guide to be as good as it can be. He did this even though he knew with the amount if info I added that he would lose the editorship.
In my opinion that makes him a good editor, one that will accept all viable contributions even if it means they lose the editorship.

While last night I went after another guide, in which the editor clearly didnt want to lose the editorship. So i have now got like another 20 denied contributions that should really have been accepted. Anyway after several pms to him, he eventually let most of my submissions through and I may have obtained editor status, but I wont find out till later.
However I did notice that some of my submissions have been edited when they didnt need to be, so i'll have to check the guys points later to make sure  he isnt trying to make bogus edits to keep me less than 40 points above him. I also noticed the biography he has done is directly copied, word for word from other sites.
Lame.

Anyway, as I said I am fairly new, but coming across a bad editor really did get me annoyed, as my denied amount has doubled unfairly, and I dont think people should block peoples submissions just because they dont want to lose an editor position. The whole point is to make comprehensive guides with as much information as is possible, without copying directly from other sources.