During the course of one of my many arguments on these boards, I noticed that the person I was arguing with was using some pretty sketchy sources. Some quick google work verified that he was relying on a wikipedia article. Part of the issue was that he was misquoting the article to make it sound more like it supported his position, but it wasn't a very good article to begin with. Since the information in question was about tax-exempt organizations, and I am familiar with where to find filings for U.S. tax-exempt organizations, I decided to update the article with information straight from the horse's mouth. Big mistake. Two days later, I'm completely addicted to editing articles. I've even created one of my own, which I'm sure will bore anyone who reads it to tears.
Someone save me...
Comments
In particular, I find myself focusing on Amusement Park & Ride articles. Though I've left my fingerprints many places, the Holiday World article is my baby. I revamped it from scratch and now it is more concise and informative than most other park articles.
Oh...and whoever created Wiki markup should be shot. It is about as user friendly as a cactus.
And also, one of your edits contained a mistake as well
-Coleman-