A Rabbit.

Recently a perplexing question was posed to me. "Is the Rabbit from Winnie the Pooh a man or woman?"
While the gender is ambiguous in the stories of the same name, the species is certainly not. Indeed, Rabbit is called Rabbit and has the appearance of a rabbit and is a rabbit. [1]

A woman.

Yet, perhaps Rabbit is an allegory—or a metaphor, a sick and insidious introduction to the world of sexual fetish for children too young to comprehend what is really happening. Indeed it is not rare for sexual fetishes to manifest themselves in children's fiction. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz was written to "to pleasure children" in the author's own words.
Lewis Carroll, another prominent children's author, has long been thought to have been a paedophile. From his photos that were as pornographic, if not more so, as Bill Henson's own disgusting 'art', to his friendships with young girls, there is much evidence to back this up. [2] [3] [4]

A man.

Yet perhaps Milne's anthropomorphic animals are even more dangerous. When one look at the animals in Winnie the Pooh one finds that most of them are based on stuffed dolls. This covers plushie fetishes. And Winnie the Pooh himself is an obese individual who clearly fits into the fat fetish, especially with his over-eating. Piglet who is often found clinging to Pooh, and clearly craves sexuality intimacy with him, and is obviously suffering from Macrophilia: a sexual fetish where the sick individual craves being dominated by a giant or giantess. [5] [6] [7]

Piglet being dominated by Pooh.

Tigger is perhaps the most anthropomorphised character, and indeed, when a furry fetishist dresses up as him, there is little difference between them and the illustrations. [8]

Note the big difference in accuracy between the Pooh furry, and the Tigger one.

Donkey is arguably the most plush-like character, and indeed, perhaps he is used to drive home the plush fetish in case any children miss it. [9]
And that leaves us with Rabbit. Arguably the most realistic of Winnie the Pooh characters, and as such, also the most disturbing. Only in countries like Sweden and Denmark is bestiality legal, yet here we find a character no promoting furry sex, but blatantly promoting bestiality! In 2005 in Sweden there was a large spike in horse-ripping incidents, a sexual fetish that involves the mutilation of horses, and one should take note of that fact that in 2005 the Winnie the Pooh books were freely available in Sweden. This clearly proves that there is an undeniable link between cases of bestiality and how widely read Winnie the Pooh is.
So is Rabbit a man or a woman? I wish I could say that it was either, but unfortunately it would appear that Rabbit is actually a rabbit. He is used as a narrative device to symbolise bestiality along with the other sickening mental illnesses expressed in the Winnie the Pooh books. [10]
So now that you know the truth behind Winnie the Pooh I implore you to please burn all of the books you find, and if you find anybody who does not want to burnt heir book, report them to social services so that they may receive the psychological help that they so desperately need. Remember, the fate of society rests in your hands. Good luck.