GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Friday, Nov 6, 2009

When I read this article regarding new releases on PSN regarding PSP games, my jaw dropped.

Dissidia: Final Fantasy is available for download on PSN for $39.99. What?! $39.99 for a downloadable game with no packaging, no manual, no physical disc and worse, no resale value?

The other games mentioned were mostly at full retail price too. This is a worrying trend. I've already blogged in the past about how the game industry is moving toward an all digital distribution method by incorporating downloadable games for sale on all the consoles. But one positive point I mentioned was that the savings companies would make from games not being burned to discs, mass-produced and shipped across the country would be turned around and passed onto consumers. But the latest offering from PSN is an about-face of that. Despite the fact that they're promoting an essentially bare-bones stripped down game package with no case or manual (it's pretty much the equivalent of buying the game from a pawn shop), the store is charging full retail for it.

I went to my local Gamestop yesterday and found that Dissidia is on sale brand new there for $34.99. I did a quick search on EBGames.com and found Dissidia retails for $39.99. So downloadable or not, the game costs pretty much the same.

The real danger here is that, while most people who hang out on sites like Gamespot and IGN and others have the good sense to know that this is a scam, there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people who have PS3s and PSPs who are going to log onto the PSN store, see Dissidia and buy it because it looks cool and they want a new game, maybe they like Final Fantasy. When people do that, they are telling Sony (and any other company that ponders charging full retail for downloadable games) that they will pay it. They will pay whatever the charge even though they're not getting nearly the value they would in a physical game. This means Sony will keep doing it. Once digital distribution becomes the absolute norm (and believe you me, that day is fast approaching), eventually every console manufacturer and game retailer, even Nintendo, will have to sell downloadable games at full retail price, if only to stay competitive. This invites the game companies to give us less for more. It tells them that it's perfectly all right to eliminate the $5-20 price point that earlier downloadable games retailed at and jack it up to a minimum of $30 (which actually started a while ago when Tekken 5: Dark Resurrection retailed on PSN for the same price as its physical counterpart. Other games like Warhawk and Gran Turismo 5 Prologue followed the same suit). It's not that downloadable games themselves are bad, but I can't think of a single argument that supports them costing the same as physical games. They should be at least $10 cheaper just because you don't have a physical disc.

Soon every downloadable game except the cheapest indie titles will be full price and there will be nothing we can do about it. We as gamers and consumers must speak with our gaming dollar. If you must buy downloadable games, buy the cheap ones. Check the prices of physical games against their downloadable bretheren and if the price is the same, get the physical disc. And for the love of all that is good and decent, if you don't have a PSP and you want one, get the PSP-3000 with a 16GB memory stick (from Amazon, eBay, etc.) or at least wait until the PSP Go's inevitable price drop.

UPDATE:I just crossed the path of a friend of mine who told me he just bought the PSP Go for his kid. Said he paid $265 for it after taxes and downloaded two $40 games for it. He said they were "expensive because the device is new". I thought about educating him, but the damage is already done; he's got the Go now, what am I going to do, tell him to take it back?

It's already begun.

Category: Editorial
Posted by Dualmask, 10:46am
12 Comments | Post a Comment

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
Hearing you loud and clear. One thing I'm curious about in this instance is whether or not this has to do with the infamous "Square-Enix Tax" somehow making its way over from the DS to the PSP Go. In any case, this is indeed a bad sign, especially considering that it's a major publisher taking this route so quickly.

That said, I think that this won't be taking off as well as Sony, S-E, and maybe a few other parties involved hope it will. I think we're talking about two groups of consumers here, and I don't think either of them are ready or willing to make the jump to exclusively digital content. First, you have the more educated gamer that more or less knows what is at stake here, and given the response to the Go so far, it probably means that it's not time for them to jump on-board. Then, you have those who would probably stumble into the PSP Go because it's the newest thing out there, but aren't completely aware of the lack of a physical format, and I just can't seem them embracing digital games so quickly. With that in mind, there aren't too many people who we can say absolutely embrace the PSP Go right now and what it means for this industry, meaning I think consoles are safe for the moment.

Nevertheless, good work putting this entry together, though, and I hope it does something to educate a few people.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 11:59 am PT
@Madmangamer364 I don't think it's just Square. There are a couple of Star Wars games and something called Class of Heroes mentioned in the article that are priced similarly as well. But at any rate, I hope you're right, but I'm worried. There are people out there who just plain don't know what a game should retail for and what you're supposed to get. They just figure they're buying a game for a certain amount of money. When SNES/Genesis was the norm, high end games (Final Fantasy/Phantasy Star etc.) retailed for around $80. Then when games went to CD, the average price went to $50 because CDs are cheaper to produce than cartridges. Then they went up to $60 because of the economy (and I guess because Blu-Rays are a couple of nickels more expensive than DVDs). So now that they don't cost anything to mass produce at all, why are we still paying the same prices as the games in the store? Because they believe they can get away with it, and if enough misinformed people buy these games, the sellers will be proven right.

I agree the change isn't going to happen tomorrow, but I am also certain the change is coming, and it really feels like one of those things we as gamers will just have to accept, like we eventually accepted loading times and firmware updates.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 12:12 pm PT
You know where I stand on the issue and I 100% with you. They are providing no benefit, other than saving a drive to a store, for digital downloads. The companies are making a lot of savings and yet they keep the price the same... I think it is bull. All the big wigs of the industry though say this is the future. I just hope there are more people like me out there seeming we are not a part of that future... and I hope enough people like me quit and it send a big enough message.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 12:17 pm PT
I have been SCREAMING this warning ever since the Media has been pushing for digital distribution. There is absolutely NO REASON a DD game should cost the SAME amount as a game you buy in a brick and mortar store.

Absolutely no reason whatsoever.

Remember when DD was just getting started and developers were so quick to tell consumers it was in "their best interest" because it would eliminate third parties (i.e. brick and mortar stores) and therefore SAVE the consumer money because the developer could now DIRECTLY sell to the consumer and bypass fees and royalties third parties charge?

Yeah, what a crock. I've been saying this forever now: Digital distribution is a scam. They're going to charge you $59.99 for a downloadable game as they are if you got in your car and went to the store. NO REASON AT ALL.

Needless to say I agree with you and this blog.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 12:35 pm PT
I'm already there. One of the things that put me off regarding the Wii's VC was the LACK of niche titles. Then, on PSN (for PSP), I started seeing "downloadables" for $20. It was one of the factors driving me AWAY from the current gen AND some downloadables. Hell, on steam, they want you to "download" Fallout 3 for $50. And like ALL of steam's library, you have to be connected just to play what you've ALREADY PAID FOR! Lack of bc, 'pay' to download what you already own physical copies of (Sony, I'm looking at y'all), $20-$40 for a DOWNLOAD... I've been tellin' y'all this for awhile now: This generation sux!
Posted Nov 6, 2009 1:58 pm PT
@Madmangamer364 Agreed. The core/educated gamers aren't likely to buy and the cassies are typically too cheap to spend that much. It'll probably blow up in Sony and S-E's faces. I sure-as-Hell hope it does, too.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 2:11 pm PT
@nate1222 I didn't know that about Steam. Granted, I barely use it for anything (the only thing I ever did with it was download the DAO character creator) but you can't play any of the games you download unless you're connected to the net? AFTER you pay full retail price for it? That's bananas. So you're basically paying full retail to stream the games from a server, even games with no actual online capabilities like Fallout. That's bull. Heck with that, I'm uninstalling Steam tonight.
Posted Nov 6, 2009 2:15 pm PT
I agree with you that I also I thought that download games would be at least a little cheaper than their physical counter-parts given the fact that there is a cut in production cost since they don't have to actually produce or ship anything. For now I would say, if you can, take advantage of the fact that games can be transferred to more than one PSP. My friend and I go halves on most games that come out. 20$ each for a copy Dissidia is a much better price than 39.99$
Posted Nov 7, 2009 12:23 am PT
Not much to add here, totally agreed. I like $2 DSi games, I like $5 WiiWare games, but paying $40 without really "owning" the game is a joke.
Posted Nov 7, 2009 1:00 am PT
@Geostrike My Brother downloaded FF Dissidia. And while he likes it, he still felt that $40 for a "download" was ridiculous.
Posted Nov 8, 2009 5:31 pm PT
@nate1222 I'm not saying that 40$ for a digital copy is reasonable, I'm just saying going halves can lessen the blow some. It's not so much games like Dissidia that bother me, it's more games like Fate/Stay Night that really annoy me. The game goes for 29.99$ in the PSN and is download only meaning that there was no production costs and the game was barely translated so there shouldn't be much cost there, so there is no way in hell that game should be full price yet it is for some reason.
Posted Nov 8, 2009 7:26 pm PT
@Geostrike I feel you on FATE. I actually like that game. But it retails for $19.99 and I downloaded it (PC) for $9.99. So PSN's price is definately a jip.
Posted Nov 9, 2009 5:45 am PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • Dualmask
  • Level: 1 (8%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 457
  • Messages Read: 0


advertisement
Click Here

Friends

My Friends