| : |
Dear Friend,
|
Somehow, I don't think that this official statement answers my concerns posed in my last two blog entries, which were letters to the White House.
A business has the right to preserve itself, just as a human does. This right is revoked only when the business infringed upon the rights of others. The logical conclusion of the idea that 'it is fair to give everybody health care, including those who are at risk of defaulting', or that 'it is fair to give everybody a mortgage, even those who are at risk of foreclosure', is that everybody has a right to the services of others. And I do not believe that you wish to say that everybody has the right to the job that they want, even if they are 'risky' applicants.
The logical conclusion of this policy is the premise that we must serve the desires of other people regardless of whether they have been earned or whether they are rational, which is both irrational and immoral.
The only way that a business can provide coverage or income for individuals whom they cannot afford is either with outside help -- or at the point of a gun. Who earns the money that the government plans to give them? And who insures this money?
dissonantblack