Tuesday, Nov 6, 2007
Was looking at games like Army of Two and Kane & Lynch. Now I know for a fact Kane & Lynch is not online co-op but not sure about Army of Two but heard there is no online co-op either.
Now I don't care if a game is or isn't an exclusive to a certain console...but every game that is boasting a co-op expierience MUST have online co-op over Xbox Live & PSN there is no excuse. Now I dunno if it is lazy programming or what but I just can't understand how these games don't have it. Gears and Halo have them but they are Xbox exclusives..why can't multiplatform do the same?
Just my little rant for the time being...Do you agree? comment.
Comments
Page
1
« prev
|
next »
Posted Nov 6, 2007 4:14 pm PT
Page
1
« prev
|
next »
Friends
My Friends
Dreski83
not only is it something that is a must in games considered "next-gen" but for the price of 60 bucks you would imagine a whole team focused on cramming asw much on a disc as possible
sadly, we get some half-@ss games dumped in our laps with little than a weekends worth of gameplay and thats with co-op in mind. not saying developers are completely slacking because i tried programing and coding its no easy task... yet at the same time updates, expansions, clear reasoning why something is the way it is or isn't would be better than being left in the wind with a so-so game.
maybe i expect too much, but then again it doesn't feel very next-gen when 1 out of every 20 games have something worth praising. not the best ratio in my book