GAMES: GameSpot GameFAQs MOVIES: Metacritic Movietome Comic-Con
Sunday, Jul 5, 2009

I've been a poster at the Tomb Raider forums for a while. Recently a thread was made discussing the possibility that the next Tomb Raider game will be M rated. As you might expect, this caused quite a stir, with the big fear that Lara will be shown nude in the games, though nobody seemed to have any objections to more explicit violence. But while I was composing my post on the subject, it became more than just about Tomb raider, and as much an exploration of the handling of the M rating of games in more general concepts.

So I thought it was worth sharing here as well. Like I said, much of what I say here is directed to Lara, and the Lara fan base, but almost all of it could be applied to almost any M rated game, as well as the sexuality of female video game characters, where the principle is almost universal. And now on to the topic at hand;

===================

VIOLENCE

The general consensus that seems to be found on these boards is a more realistic presentation of violence is favorable. And I don't think what we as gamers or fans of Tomb Raider are gearing towards is an excess of blood and gore. Certainly not to the extent of Gears of War, God of War, Saw, or a Rob Zombie movie.

What is really desired, pushing towards realism, is the sense of genuine consequence to the actions taking place in the game. We want to feel that when Lara finds herself in a firefight with mercenaries or a savage struggle with the local wildlife, that there is a palpable sense of danger. She should suffer certain injuries and likewise, her enemies must approach her with trepidation, especially when they are aware of her reputation as a force to be reckoned with.

SEXUALITY

Now please note that what I said here is sexuality, not sex. This has nothing to do with turning the franchise into a blatant porn series. But like it or not (as I am aware some of you out there plainly don't like it) Lara... HAS... sex appeal. And quite frankly I can't see why this should be a problem.

The biggest issue I have with the objections to a sexual portrayal of Lara is the perpetration of downright MYTHS. Can we please please PLEASE get past the ludicrous notion that Lara being sexy somehow undermines her being a strong, confident, powerful, graceful, cIassy, cultured, and intelligent woman?

I mean who said a woman couldn't be sexy AND intelligent at the same time? Can't express naughty humor AND witty repartee at the same time? Can't show confidence in her looks AND be cultured at the same time? For all you saying "she's not a porn star, she should be portrayed in only a cIassy way", I rebuke with this; It's true that if she was shown only as a sex symbol it would be a tragic disservice to her and her fans. But I would go so far as to say that her being only a dedicated archaeologist would be just as much a disservice. I want to see a fully dimensional human being, and to me its far more interesting to see complex personality traits that show realistic behaviors than "just the action heroin", which by itself would be flat and dull. To put it simply, why limit how Lara is defined? Someone who is realistically multi faceted is far more interesting and offers much more to amire.

Now there was a note here that "Lara is sexy because she's not trying to be". And this is correct as well. Yet we see her very often in outfits that accentuate her exquisite physique. That would almost seem like she is showing off, but here's why that's not the case. Lara has that aristocratic upbringing and if I understand that culture, women are more often "prim and proper" as the expression goes. But part of Lara's psychology, is that she lives by her own rules and doesn't bend to convention. So when she's going out there looking like she's posing for a fitness babe calendar, it's not motivated by any fulfillment of ego or vanity. It's because she doesn't care to follow the "rules" of what it is to be a lady, and sure as hell doesn't give a damn what others in her society think. She's just doing what she wants to do, with no thought of seeking approval for her looks. And yes, that is sexy as hell. What is also very appealing to me is the range Lara has when it comes to sexiness. She very successfully pulls of beach beauty hotness, athletic hotness, and even elegant and refined hotness. She is diverse and how can that not be seen as enticing on so many levels?

On the related subject of nudity, I feel it IS justified where the context deems it appropriate. I know some of you will vehemently disagree with that, and that it never has a place anywhere. But those are my thoughts. To take a page from the DOA series, what I find very sexy about that is that while it does show provocative imagery, yet never makes use of full frontal nudity. Instead, they take the more creative approach, employing a combination of controlled camera angles and environmental and other props to obscure the full view of the female so you can't see it all even when she's undressed. And I do fully support that this approach has artistic merit.

Of course the question is, would any situation Lara finds herself in entail a circumstance that she'd lose her clothing? Probably not. As stated before, she shouldn't be combating tigers and mercenaries in her bikini. But I suppose you might have those down time moments after or in between an exploratiodan, when she emerges from the shower (was seen in an earlier Core game), or she could be lounging by her pool when some agent approaches her for an assignment offer. Maybe even during an exploration, she sees a lagoon with waterfall, and decides to clean up a bit and refresh herself after getting very sweaty and grimy (again employing the DOA approach to the cinematic), where it would be a reasonable action to take. I mean who honestly enjoys feeling grimy?

So to summarize the sexuality and nudity issue; if we really want it to be handled in a mature manner, gamers need to get past this erroneous notion that the female body and the sexuality aspect of psychology is a "dirty and shameful" thing. It shouldn't be seen as a crime. And remember that point I made of violence? Why do some people want that to be given a respectful treatment with authenticity, but when it comes to human behavior, sex is suddenly not part of the equation of what makes a person realistic? It seems realism is constrained by limiting mores, and it really shouldn't be.

CONTEXT

The final aspect of mature content I wanted to tackle is, well content itself. The very substance of the story, the handling of subject matter in both a realistic and thoughtful manner, and mainly being able to explore controversial and provocative issues. And considering what Lara does for a living, the stories are rife with potential here. I mean she's gotta be pissing off a lot of locals, trespassing into territory that is a sacred part of their cultural history. Or just the heated debates she could get into, trying to expose the "truth" (taken from the story context the writers choose to create for various mythologies) that clashes with peoples deeply held beliefs to the nature of deities and relics. A conflict of knowledge vs faith could provide such rich drama. Though really, I'm just spit balling here, lol.

Then there's the use of language. There was that poll option which never made it in, Lara suddenly dropping the f-bomb left right and center. But we all know she wouldn't adopt that language usage, she far too much a lady for that. But what about the other characters she encounters? She often has to deal with all manner of unseemly people to get leads for what she's looking for. Or how about the mercs she combats in the jungles? Now we would never like to hear this about our beloved heroin - yet is it realistic to expect that they, hired guns not exactly known for refinement, to hold her in the same regard we do? Especially when she is shooting at them? Would it be unrealistic to expect that in the heat of a firefight, they would be screaming the f-bomb at her, not to mention calling her all manner of unsavory descriptions... I'm sure you can fill in the blanks there. Again, we're talking about a ruthless lot, who has no reason to be polite.

Comments

Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
I disagree with parts of the sexuality bit. I doubt Toby Gard ever wanted Lara to show off her body in that way at all. It's a bit extreme but yeah.

That idea where she bends elite upbringing in favour of showing her boobs? Nah, don't buy it . It's simply to reel in the fanboys straight up.

That being said, she can have revealing outfits, but it's up to the developer to not make it look sleazy. Things like mid shots of Lara pretty much scream "BOOBIES!" and it gets annoying since it's just so obvious.

Am I opposed to having a nude Lara? No. In fact, it could be done very well e.g a sickening scene where she's stripped of her clothes and chucked into a prison cell in an indifferent manner. And she could be fully clothed for all I care but if that sequence is a "get off" sequence I'm going to be disappointed. Lara's saving the world, I doubt there's time for her to put on the sexuality so consciously.

So yeah, please CD, don't turn Lara into a sexbomb anymore than she already is.

A good rule of thumb is to make sure your female character isn't turning other females off. Lara's (game version) been hit or miss with the female community only until recently. I know Angelina Jolie's Lara is well received.
Posted Jul 5, 2009 7:14 pm PT
I don't know about Lara Croft going rated M honestly. It would just feel unnecessary for me of having a character who's been 13+ rated for so long. How I felt when the Soul Calibur girls dressed worse in SCIV.
Posted Jul 5, 2009 7:21 pm PT
This entry somewhat turned me on.
Posted Jul 5, 2009 7:49 pm PT
Hey Frozen, I'm not sure if I was clear enough about Lara's attitude towards sexiness. What I was saying is that she doesn't act as she does with any deliberate intent to show off, nor to act sexy in defiance of aristocratic convention, but more that she's indifferent towards trying to convey any kind of image of hotness. She doesn't care how she's perceived by the public, if others think she's an attention whore, its not her concern, she knows it wasn't her intent.

Now the game devs might still have their own marketing angle to sell the character, but I'm talking more about the story context, from the point of view within the fictional reality, and separating those levels.

And really, when do we see female characters not marketed with sex appeal? Rayne, Kasumi, Cammy, Joanna Dark, Jill Valentine, Kaileena, Nariko (I dcan even remember the TV ad slogan "Vengeance has never looked so beautiful"), and so many others. Even Nintendo, the most kid friendly platform depicts their leading lady as a gorgeous blonde with a playboy body in a very snug blue suit. If the character is female, she'll always be attractive, and even if not in a bikini, you can be damn sure her outfit will flatter her figure. You'll never see a lead female character going about her mission in her baggy sweat shirt like she just got out of bed and rushed to the crime scene investigation. They're all guilty.
Posted Jul 5, 2009 9:29 pm PT
continued...

So really what keeps all that from becoming just eye candy, is a fully developed character personality, and to know they are motivated by more than just looking their best. And sure enough, Lara offers all that in abundance, same as Samus, Joanna, and the rest. She pursues the mysteries of the world, can hob knob with the upper crust, is a very knowledgeable and cultured lady.

Do the devs implement this for the viewers eye candy? Yeah. But nobody complains, and it will be justified as long as there's substance beneath the surface, which in most cases there are.
Posted Jul 5, 2009 9:29 pm PT
But I think I trailed off a little too far from where I was really going with this. Mainly that I wish people would lighten up about this and stop making it a crime for females to be sexy. If they have the substance, what's the problem with a little harmless presentation? And yes, Toby Gard did object to the way Eidos was marketing Lara way back in the TR 1 and 2 days, with the pinup ads they used.

I'll reiterate, if sexuality is going to be treated in a truly mature manner, we gotta grow past this archic outlook of the female body and a sexy attitude being "dirty and shameful". I mean who ever raises hell over male characters always being muscular and wearing tight outfits (in some cases being shirtless)? There's as much beefcake as there is cheesecake. My idea of being mature about sexuality, is to not make a big deal out of it all the time.

Oh yeah, and I never even thought of the idea of Lara being stripped when being imprisoned if she was ever captured by some militia, which would also be a probable scenrio she could find herself in. Good catch there Frozen.
Posted Jul 5, 2009 9:31 pm PT
Well I stopped playing Tomb Raider years ago.

Great blog though.
Posted Jul 6, 2009 12:52 am PT
I know the series went into decline after Tomb Raider 3. But when Crystal Dynamics took it over with Legend, they revitalized the game bringing it back to its exploration roots, not just with the environments, but exploration of ancient mythologies. This continues even more in Underowrld.

Don't give up on Lara Raptor
Posted Jul 6, 2009 4:48 am PT
Posted Jul 6, 2009 6:57 am PT
@AdobeArtist

In one of your comments, you were talking about other characters that are also guilty of this. What about Krystal from Star Fox? I know she's an animal and all, but someone at Nintendo when they first intoduced her in Star Fox Adventures, she was wearing something of what looks like Princess Leia's slave suit in Star Wars VI: Return of the Jedi. In Assault, she was in a snug suit, like what Samus wears.
Posted Jul 6, 2009 8:11 am PT
Alyx Vance is not depicted as a sexbomb, and Jade from Beyond Good & Evil wears baggy clothes =P. Also, save the Dead or Alive Xtreme beach volleyball games, Kasumi has never been depicted as a sex symbol. It's the fans and their weird fantasies and fanart that brought her to sex symbol status.

The thing is, Adobe, presentation of the character still counts. Again, with Kasumi. In DOAX she's canonically suppose to be looking for her brother Hayate but gets trapped on the beach. I'm not so convinced about it when she spreads her legs atop a tree trunk whilst sweetly pondering where her brother could be. Mikaela Banes is suppose to be some tough-as-nails mechanic in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. All I saw of Megan Fox was an audition tape for a future career as a porn star.

CD actually did very damn well with Lara's portrayal in Underworld, and it should stay that way. It might've been a bit darker than usual (save Angel of Darkness) but if that's what it takes to take the camera off her boobs than so be it.

Another thing I'm a bit skeptical about, is swearing. Sure, the goons she fights are evil. Megatron is also evil. Imagine if Megatron started swearing like a weathered sailor. Swearing is okay in Gears of War, in fact I'd encourage it. Swearing would feel too damn forced in Tomb Raider. It would just be unnecessary, as unnecessary as Scar swearing at his hyenas for mucking up.
Posted Jul 6, 2009 5:39 pm PT
@ Nintendoboy

The thing about these characters that are rendered in a highly cartoony styIe, they are illustrated to be femenine, but far more in a cute way than a hot way. They're meant to be appealing to the other characters in that universe where all the inhabitants have tails and pointed ears, so by their own standards, the male animals consider the female to be pretty.

I can remember from Animaniacs the character Minerva Mynx. She's obviously very feminine, but in a caricature design than realistic, her appeal is shown by the reaction of the other characters who all go ga-ga just losing their sense - their jaws drop, tails thump, a thumping heart popping from their chest, and the hearts in front of their eyes. All this done in an exaggerated manner.

The idea being, the writers play these characters off to be a comical portrayal of romances between boys and' girls. It's all in light hearted fun and not some hardcore anime pron. When cartoon characters are rendered to be attractive, it's to be so to the inhabitants of this cartoon universe (Peach would be another example), going by the standards of the given fiction, and not really an eye candy for the viewing audience.

Of course you do get some fans who take the source material, and expand on that with their own imaginations. There's this pron fetish sub category of "furries" for example. But that isn't in the designers intention, where they have no control of which direction a segmented group will take things.
Posted Jul 6, 2009 9:22 pm PT
@ FrozenLiquid

I never said all females in games (also comic books and animated media) were deliberately illustrated as sexbombs. Just that they are always attractive and in most cases portrayed in outfits that will accentuate and flatter their features. Looking at this case by case;

Alyx Vance: Not deliberately rendered as a sexbomb, but she is intentionally designed to be attractive, in a distinct and girl next door styIe. This is what the fans find appealing about her and she's appeared in enough hottest game babe lists.

Jade: she does wear baggy pants, but also a small top, so its clear enough by any observation that she's got an athletic body and an exotic face. Her presentation of attractiveness is unique.

Kasumi: Are you kiddin me? Even before the Beach Volleyball series, before we first saw her in a bikini, her primary outfit in the main DOA games was short blue robe showing off a generous portion of cleavage? You can't tell me Team Ninja didn't have a sexy image of her in mind, as well as the other female fighters. But again, I'm not judging on that
Posted Jul 6, 2009 9:48 pm PT
....continued

I do agree that Lara has been showcased in a much darker manner in Underworld, but then so is the context of that story.She has always been sexy, but not limited to eye candy, as she has always been strong, adventurous, courageous, cultured, and witty too.

So I really would have no problem with a little visual teasing as long as its done in a tasteful and artistic manner. In my earlier example, the need to clean up and refresh herself by a jungle waterfall, given what she goes through on an expedition is not that unreasonable.

With the swearing, you didn't really get my point. It's not about whether the character is evil or not. It's their background. Kingpin is evil, but he's also a businessman (a corrupt one) so swearing is out of character for him. Megatron is an alien robot, also out of character for him. But mercenaries coming from an anti-establishment background, who express their position with violence? Extrme langauge would be expected from that lot.
Posted Jul 6, 2009 9:56 pm PT
Page 1 
« prev  |  next »
  • AdobeArtist
  • Level: 1 (0%)
  • Rank: Mogwai
  • Forum Posts: 48
  • Messages Read: 0


Friends

My Friends