Critics Scoreboard
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Average Critic Score:




49
(37 sources)




49
(37 sources)
-
90




The New Yorker
Hancock suggests new visual directions and emotional tonalities for pop. It's by far the most enjoyable big movie of the summer. Read Full Review » -
88




Philadelphia Inquirer
A rollicking tale of rehabilitation and redemption, rife with cool special effects, Hancock is smart and surprisingly raunchy. Read Full Review » -
83




The Onion (A.V. Club)
It's a daring, even mildly challenging mixture for a superhero film, and while the pieces don't entirely add up, the puzzle is at least original. Read Full Review » -
75




Charlotte Observer
One of the rare action films that needed to be longer. Then changes in mood wouldn't be so abrupt, and director Peter Berg and writers Vincent Ngo and Vince Gilligan would've had more time to reveal things we want to know. Read Full Review » -
75




Rolling Stone
Bateman doesn't make a false move, and a stellar Charlize Theron springs her own bolts from the blue as Ray's wife. As for Smith, he's on fire. There's nothing like a star shining on his highest beams. You follow him anywhere. Read Full Review » -
75




Chicago Sun-Times
Hancock is a lot of fun, if perhaps a little top-heavy with stuff being destroyed. Smith makes the character more subtle than he has to be, more filled with self-doubt, more willing to learn. Read Full Review » -
75




Miami Herald
The real hit of the movie is the hilarious Bateman. His low-key humor makes you wish Hancock could have saved Bateman's short-lived sitcom "Arrested Development." Now that would have been heroic. Read Full Review » -
70




The New York Times
Hancock makes for one unexpectedly satisfying and kinky addition to Hollywood's superhero chronicles. Touching and odd, laden with genuine twists and grounded by three appealing lead performances. Read Full Review » -
70




Chicago Reader
As popcorn movies go, this is fleet, funny, and even thoughtful: its central question, nicely underplayed by director Peter Berg, is why power and altruism never seem to intersect. Read Full Review » -
67




Portland Oregonian
In a film marketplace where even the best superhero movies tend to do a lot of the same stuff, I really admire Will Smith and bad-boy director Peter Berg for trying something different. Read Full Review » -
67




Baltimore Sun
The first half is diverting and inventive. But the filmmakers use the second half as a box-office insurance policy. They fill it with the conventional super-heroics and heartbreak that they spend the first 45 minutes gleefully deconstructing. Read Full Review » -
67




Seattle Post-Intelligencer
The script doesn't always find the most effective way to the heart of the conflicts and Berg struggles to balance the mix of tones and the conflicts of man and superman, but he never sacrifices the integrity of his characters or their relationships for an easy ending. That alone makes Hancock the most adult of the new wave of superhero dramas. Read Full Review » -
63




The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
The promise is dangled yet never developed. Rather, the narrative slips into a backstory that alternates between confusing and contradictory. Read Full Review » -
63




ReelViews
Sometimes funny, sometimes clever, and occasionally involving, but it's never brilliant and its edge is compromised by the neutering that accompanies the teen-friendly PG-13 rating. Read Full Review » -
60




Salon.com
Hancock is just intriguing enough that I kept wishing it were better. But Berg doesn't have the subtle touch that this material needs. Read Full Review » -
60




The Hollywood Reporter
The visual effects are stellar, but the true star is Smith, who again demonstrates acting chops as well as effortless charisma in a vehicle that's only occasionally worthy of his superhuman skills. Read Full Review » -
60




LA Weekly
Doesn't seem to quite know what it is or where it's headed. So it goes anywhere it can while treading thematic water. Read Full Review » -
60




Empire
See-saws between straight superhero movie and parody, with layers of soap-opera fudge in between. A lot of solid scenes - but Hancock lacks the power of super-coherence. Read Full Review » -
58




Entertainment Weekly
Hancock can revel in schmuckery, of course, because you and I and cute kids and peaceful oldies worldwide know in advance that there's no way on Hollywood's green earth Will Smith will ever play someone seriously, dangerously unsavory. Read Full Review » -
50





-
50




San Francisco Chronicle
More intelligent than most summer blockbusters and features at its center a thought-out and committed performance by Will Smith. But in the end it's merely ALMOST good. Read Full Review » -
50




TV Guide
The result is an inconsistent, incoherent anti-superhero action-adventure comedy. Read Full Review » -
50




Film Threat
Starts off promisingly, but gets bogged down when it abandons humor for gravity. Read Full Review » -
50




Boston Globe
Once the vulgar comedy dissipates, we're left with poorly photographed, bullet-riddled summer-action mayhem. The only thing drunker than Hancock is the editing and camerawork. Read Full Review » -
50




USA Today
Might have been more appropriately titled "Hodgepodge." What starts out with a sense of quirky fun loses direction and devolves into a mishmash of story lines. Read Full Review » -
42




Christian Science Monitor
What begins as a pretty good comedy devolves rapidly into a high-flown example of Hollywood messagemongering. Read Full Review » -
40




Los Angeles Times
It's a strange feeling to see the summer's most promising premise self-destruct into something bizarre and unsatisfying, but that is the Hancock experience. Read Full Review » -
40




New York Daily News
There's a great idea here, but it's buried within a muddled story that lurches between dark comedy and maudlin drama. Read Full Review » -
40




Slate
The climax, a multipart showdown in the corridors of a hospital, is unforgivably manipulative. What self-respecting director still cuts away to shots of a heartbeat monitor flat-lining? Hancock isn't the only underachiever on the premises--the talented Berg settles for far less than he should. Read Full Review » -
40




Village Voice
It doesn't take itself as seriously as it should, and undercuts a final act that should have and so could have packed a mighty emotional wallop. Read Full Review » -
38




New York Post
This movie fails so spectacularly - and on so many levels - that it's like watching a train plummet off a bridge. Read Full Review » -
38




Chicago Tribune
Not even Smith's charisma can mitigate the chaos that is Hancock. Read Full Review » -
30




Newsweek
The superhero genre screams for a makeover, or at least a smart deconstruction, but Hancock isn't that movie. It just ups the foolishness ante. Read Full Review » -
30




Variety
The effects are snazzy, even if they pass by quite quickly, and there's enough going on to keep audiences watching, if not entirely happy. Smith, Theron and Bateman capably handle the main roles, but such is the skimpiness of the scenario that no further characters make any impact. Read Full Review » -
30




Washington Post
The problem is that director Peter Berg, aided and abetted by Smith and Theron and third banana Jason Bateman, seem to have made it literally, not realizing its out-of-whack tonalities and grotesque plot twists were meant to be played for laughs. Read Full Review » -
30





-
0




Wall Street Journal
Any notions of demolishing black stereotypes -- and what else could have possessed Mr. Smith to do this? -- are dashed by the coarseness of it all, and by the narrative incoherence; a surprising plot twist turns a sloppy action-comedy into a totally different movie, and an even worse one. Read Full Review »
You Say
click on a star to rate