Critics Scoreboard
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Average Critic Score:
64
(37 sources)
64
(37 sources)
-
100
Empire
A dazzling experiment that paid off immensely, this is cinematic pleasure at its purest. One caveat: If they ever make a sequel, we're taking two stars back. Read Full Review » -
91
The Onion (A.V. Club)
It puts human faces on the victims of mass destruction, faces that might easily have been yours or mine, staring down the maw of something we don't understand. Read Full Review » -
90
New York Magazine
We've never sat through anything with Cloverfield's subjective sting. You'd have to be tougher than I was not to be blown sideways by it. Read Full Review » -
90
Village Voice
Cloverfield never stops to identify the why, whence, or whereto of its rampaging meanie--this relentless thriller stops for nothing--but as for what to call it, behold . . . al-Qaedzilla! Read Full Review » -
89
Austin Chronicle
Cloverfield is the most intense and original creature feature I've seen in my adult moviegoing life, and that's coming from a guy who knows his Gojira from his Gamera and his Harryhausen from his Honda. Cloverfield isn't a horror film - it's a pure-blood, grade A, exultantly exhilarating monster movie. Read Full Review » -
83
Portland Oregonian
It's a sharp and vivid film, filled with moments of tremendous ingenuity and characterized by a persistent avoidance of the expected tropes. It's far scarier than the big-budget remakes of "Godzilla" and "King Kong," more engaging than "I Am Legend," more human than a sackful of slasher films. Read Full Review » -
83
Entertainment Weekly
Cloverfield, a surreptitiously subversive, stylistically clever little gem of an entertainment disguised, under its deadpan-neutral title, as a dumb Gen-YouTube monster movie, makes the convincingly chilling argument that the world will end -- or, at least, Manhattan will crumble -- with a bang and a whimper. Read Full Review » -
75
ReelViews
Cloverfield's gritty, in-your-face style is uncompromising. If you're looking for a nice, clean movie filmed with a steadycam, you'll have to look elsewhere. Read Full Review » -
75
Chicago Tribune
It's dumb but quick and dirty and effectively brusque, dispensing with niceties such as character. Read Full Review » -
75
Premiere
It's not the life-changing movie experience the intense viral marketing attention would lead you to think it is, but its decision to focus on ground-level humanism rather than epic disaster is what separates it from the pack. Read Full Review » -
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
When the monster shows up, pretty early in the film, everything becomes much more interesting, as it smashes buildings in midtown Manhattan like some sort of Rudy Giuliani, 9/11 nightmare. Read Full Review » -
75
USA Today
The genre may be old news, but the skillfully made Cloverfield offers a heart-racing experience with plenty of chills, thrills and exhilaration. Read Full Review » -
75
New York Daily News
Manhattan has always been a fat target for apocalypse filmmakers, but with its 9/11-inspired imagery, Matt Reeves' breathlessly fast-paced Cloverfield is going to resonate with New York audiences in a way no other horror film has. Read Full Review » -
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Cloverfield is an exercise in realism that lacks reality's broader and richer context. Or, put another way, the experiment is artful, but it ain't art. Read Full Review » -
75
San Francisco Chronicle
Produced by "Lost" and "Alias" mastermind J.J. Abrams, Cloverfield has been one of the more interesting experiments in large-scale guerrilla filmmaking. Read Full Review » -
75
Christian Science Monitor
It's been a while since we've had a good monster movie, and while Cloverfield probably won't give you sleepless nights, it will certainly keep you awake in the theater. Read Full Review » -
75
Chicago Sun-Times
Mercifully, at 84 minutes the movie is even shorter than its originally alleged 90-minute running time; how much visual shakiness can we take? And yet, all in all, it is an effective film, deploying its special effects well and never breaking the illusion that it is all happening as we see it. Read Full Review » -
75
Boston Globe
Cloverfield is content to be a creature feature; that's what makes it bearable and what keeps it from greatness. The genre, not the script, does the psychological heavy lifting. Read Full Review » -
75
Miami Herald
There are a few surprises lurking in Cloverfield, and director Matt Reeves has an uncanny ability to time his jolts and scare when you least expect it. Read Full Review » -
70
-
70
The New Yorker
Cloverfield is a vastly old-fashioned piece of work, creaking with hilarious contrivance. I was thrilled, for instance, to hear someone actually speak the line "It's alive!" Read Full Review » -
70
The Hollywood Reporter
Think "Godzilla Unplugged" -- with chillingly effective results. Read Full Review » -
70
Chicago Reader
The narrative conceit requires a fair amount of indulgence as the story progresses, but the fleeting, incomplete glimpses of the monster early on prove the old dictum of B movie auteur Val Lewton that a momentary image can have greater impact than a prolonged one. Read Full Review » -
67
-
63
Philadelphia Inquirer
Much scampering, yelling, quaking and crying is required of the actors, and they acquit themselves well enough, even with oozing fake wounds and prop rebars piercing their shoulder blades. Read Full Review » -
63
Rolling Stone
Now that the fanboy hype has cleared, we can see Cloverfield for what it is: borrowed inspiration, trite screenwriting and amateurish acting all in the service of a ballsy idea -- that a horror movie could maybe, just maybe, have a soul. Read Full Review » -
60
Slate
Despite a first reel entirely devoted to establishing characters, Cloverfield is basically a line-'em-up, pick-'em-off horror movie that's effective without being either viscerally frightening or emotionally moving. Watching it is like going through a car wash: You come out of it thoroughly Cloverfield-ized, but essentially unchanged. Read Full Review » -
50
-
50
New York Post
Combines unpleasantness and stupidity to a degree that would be difficult to match unless you were stuck in bed with a case of the shingles while being forced to watch "The Ghost Whisperer." Read Full Review » -
50
Variety
Despite its indie-flavored shooting style, first-rate visual effects, reasonable intensity factor, nihilistic attitude and post-9/11 anxiety overlay, this punchy sci-fier is, in the end, not much different from all the marauding creature features that have come before it. Read Full Review » -
50
LA Weekly
While the entertainment value of Cloverfield is highly negotiable, it's clear that Abrams has consciously aligned himself with those filmmakers who have used the template of a grade-B monster/invasion movie -- Don Siegel, George Romero, Steven Spielberg -- as a stealth vessel for social commentary. Read Full Review » -
50
Time
Mind you, I don't begrudge the creators of even a junk-food movie like Cloverfield the fun they had demolishing New York one more time. Read Full Review » -
50
Los Angeles Times
Adept at wringing maximum suspense and might have reached the heights of the Korean monster film "The Host" but for the limitations of the camcorder ploy. While it injects the film with a run-and-gun urgency, the device grows tiresome and ultimately leaves the film shortchanged. Read Full Review » -
38
Charlotte Observer
No movie this year will better embody Macbeth's description of life itself: "a tale ... full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." Read Full Review » -
30
Washington Post
Cloverfield is a relentless, I-thought-my-eyeballs-were-bleeding exercise in visual disorientation. Read Full Review » -
30
The New York Times
Like too many big-studio productions, Cloverfield works as a showcase for impressively realistic-looking special effects, a realism that fails to extend to the scurrying humans whose fates are meant to invoke pity and fear but instead inspire yawns and contempt. Rarely have I rooted for a monster with such enthusiasm. Read Full Review » -
30
Salon.com
It pretends to examine how self-absorbed we are as a culture, only to be consumed by its own self-absorption. It's also badly constructed, humorless and emotionally sadistic . Read Full Review »
You Say
click on a star to rate
