Critics Scoreboard
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Average Critic Score:
41
(33 sources)
41
(33 sources)
-
100
The Onion (A.V. Club)
A chilly and extraordinarily controlled treatise on film violence, Funny Games punishes the audience for its casual bloodlust by giving it all the sickening torture and mayhem it could possibly desire. Neat trick, that. Read Full Review » -
89
Austin Chronicle
You can take a page from Wes Craven before he went flat and keep repeating, "It's only a movie; it's only a movie; it's only a movie." But is it? Read Full Review » -
88
Miami Herald
The experience of watching Funny Games, be it the original or this version, is never forgotten, whatever your ultimate impression of the film. Read Full Review » -
88
-
83
Entertainment Weekly
Can a movie be gripping and repellent at the same time? In Funny Games, a mockingly sadistic and terrifying watch-the-middle-class-writhe-like-stuck-pigs thriller, the director Michael Haneke puts his characters in a vise, and the audience too. Read Full Review » -
80
Film Threat
By and large, reviewers have conceded that the picture is exceptionally gripping and suspenseful while deriding its moral subtext as a crock. The only explanation possible for such fuming pettiness, in my opinion, is the fact that Michael Haneke isn't one of us. Read Full Review » -
80
Empire
A stylish, darkly satirical horror-thriller, raising serious questions about Hollywood's sanitisation of violence. Read Full Review » -
75
Portland Oregonian
One might reasonably despise Funny Games and consider Haneke an exploitative hypocrite. Still, whether it's the original or the replica, this is a film that is impossible to enjoy and difficult to forget. Read Full Review » -
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Is Funny Games an unqualified success? No, and for this reason: In order to analyze the devolution of violence into entertainment, the premise obliges the film to superimpose a complicated game atop the genre's simple one - in other words, it makes a game out of the game it condemns. Read Full Review » -
75
Philadelphia Inquirer
Watts, who is one of the film's executive producers, brings a taut intelligence to the proceedings, but her character, like Roth's, is more archetype than actual person. Read Full Review » -
70
Dallas Observer
Haneke rigs the movie into a weapon against its audience. Like the infected porn that destroys perverts in Cronenberg's "Videodrome," Funny Games means to kill our pleasure in the very thing we theoretically paid to see: zipless, guilt-free, morally untroubled mayhem. Read Full Review » -
70
Washington Post
While the movie's star -- and ruler, and ship's captain, and grand poobah -- is Haneke himself, his actors are sublime. Read Full Review » -
70
The Hollywood Reporter
Perhaps the best way to appreciate the picture, its few intellectual pretensions notwithstanding, is as a classy horror film with a particularly nasty edge. It's not exactly entertainment, but it casts a poisonous spell. Read Full Review » -
50
Boston Globe
If this is daring in theory, it's a failure in practice. Exactingly well-made, the movie is grueling and unpleasant in the extreme - that's the point - but it's also working from a specious premise, that film-school Brechtian devices can bring on mass enlightenment. Read Full Review » -
50
TV Guide
The film is merciless in its depiction of death and suffering, Pitt and Corbet are perfectly cast, and Watts, who also served as executive producer, gives a disturbingly raw performance. Read Full Review » -
50
Chicago Tribune
Funny Games is fundamentally a bourgeois exercise in authorial sadism. As the methodical games grind on, the suffocatingly beige and white surroundings start to look like a mausoleum. Read Full Review » -
50
Slate
Many American viewers may take Haneke at his word and walk out midway through this grueling ethics exam of a movie. But much as I may resent the facile polemics of Haneke's shame-the-viewer project, I have to respect the way that he nailed me, trembling, to my seat. Read Full Review » -
50
Chicago Reader
It's one thing to make a movie filled with mayhem and then implicate the audience for watching it; it's another thing entirely to come back ten years later with the same movie, hype it with a marketing campaign, and try to implicate the viewer again. One nice thing about America is that you can't be tried twice for the same crime. Read Full Review » -
40
Salon.com
Haneke's new Funny Games has a current of bleak humor that comes through more clearly when you're not reading subtitles. It remains a horrifying, implacable mind-fuck, liable to be widely misunderstood and widely despised. Read Full Review » -
38
Premiere
The picture, remade by the maestro Haneke himself, is every bit as gripping, suspenseful and upsetting as the original. And it's even more of a crock. Read Full Review » -
38
USA Today
So sadistic and disturbing, Games is easily the toughest movie to sit through since 1994's "Natural Born Killers." Read Full Review » -
38
New York Daily News
A patronizing, self-satisfied piece of work, Funny Games is Michael Haneke's way of chastising us for blindly following the traditional rules of entertainment. Read Full Review » -
30
The New Yorker
The new movie wears an air of old hat. I would absolutely defend Haneke's right to relaunch his broadside on our voyeuristic vices, but he's not keeping up with the times; he's behind them. Read Full Review » -
30
Variety
As shocking and deliberately manipulative as the original movie and -- some may reckon -- even more pointless. Read Full Review » -
25
Baltimore Sun
Funny Games is an art house "Hostel" -- it mistakes self-consciousness for intelligence. Read Full Review » -
25
New York Post
The joke is on arthouse audiences who show up for Funny Games, which is basically torture porn every bit as manipulative and reprehensible as "Hostel," even if it's tricked out with intellectual pretension. Read Full Review » -
25
San Francisco Chronicle
Just because it's a conscious commentary on other vile, useless, pointless cinematic exercises doesn't make it any less vile, useless and pointless. Read Full Review » -
20
Newsweek
That this relentless barrage of psychological and physical torture is extremely well made and powerfully performed--Watts hurls herself into her physically demanding role with heroic conviction--somehow makes it worse. Read Full Review » -
20
Village Voice
Professional obligations required that I endure it, but there's no reason why you should. Read Full Review » -
16
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
One thing you can say about Michael Haneke's unbelievably brutal thriller, Funny Games, is that it's an experience: an unpleasant, unsettling, cruelly manipulative and finally hateful experience, but an experience nonetheless. You'll likely lose some sleep over this one. Read Full Review » -
0
The New York Times
The film calls attention to its own artificial status. It actually knows it's a movie! What a clever, tricky game! What fun! What a fraud. Read Full Review » -
0
Wall Street Journal
In addition to being borderline unendurable, Funny Games is inexplicable, and I don't mean in any philosophical sense. Read Full Review » -
0
New York Magazine
Haneke's assault on our fantasy lives is shallow, unimaginative, and glacially unengaged--a sucker punch without the redeeming passion of punk. Read Full Review »
You Say
click on a star to rate
