Critics Scoreboard
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Average Critic Score:
37
(30 sources)
37
(30 sources)
-
70
Dallas Observer
To the fan of ’80s slashers, this return to glorious excess is a beautiful thing. Read Full Review » -
67
Entertainment Weekly
So can Freddy beat up Jason, or what? Let's just say that neither one would have stood a chance against Abbott and Costello. Read Full Review » -
63
Chicago Tribune
Succeeds as a guilty pleasure, a monster mash that clobbers the recent lackluster sequels plaguing both legacies. If only that were a higher compliment. Read Full Review » -
63
Miami Herald
A surprisingly ambitious entry into a genre that felt bankrupt and over more than a decade ago. Read Full Review » -
60
-
50
Premiere
Are these iconic, antihero relics smartly satirized in a post-slasher, or is FVJ just more dated, third-wave trash? Disappointingly, it's the latter. Read Full Review » -
50
New York Daily News
Though a stickler might ask what's at stake in a fight to the death between two guys who are already dead, the hard-core fans aren't likely to be disappointed. Read Full Review » -
50
Variety
The basic formula of iconic supernatural beings slaughtering plucky teenagers continues with even more graphic violence. Read Full Review » -
50
Los Angeles Times
Tremendous energy, outrageous humor, dazzling technical finesse -- and a numbing amount of violence, brutality, bloodshed and all-out savagery. It is downright depressing to think about all that vigorous cinematic artistry and expertise aimed so low. Read Full Review » -
50
Boston Globe
Attempts none of the witty, provocative visual and metaphysical set pieces from any of the ''Nightmare'' movies. And it offers none of the real fright of the early ''Friday the 13th'' films. In fact, the movie is deeply, proudly unimaginative. Read Full Review » -
50
San Francisco Chronicle
Considering what the filmmakers had to work with, and the fact that it has all been done before, Freddy Vs. Jason isn't bad. And sometimes not bad is almost good. Read Full Review » -
50
Baltimore Sun
The setup is bad even by slasher-film standards: poorly acted, atrociously written and unimaginatively directed. But once Freddy and Jason have at it, the movie takes on a recklessly kinetic energy that finally delivers on its title's promise. Read Full Review » -
50
-
50
ReelViews
The best way to sum up Freddy Vs. Jason is: good concept, mediocre execution. Read Full Review » -
42
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Doesn't have any of the creepy suspense that graced the first "Friday" movies, and very little of the Daliesque dream imagery of the early "Nightmares." It's just a slam-bang succession of gross-out mutilations, played for giggles. Read Full Review » -
40
LA Weekly
The sentimental novelty of watching two childhood antiheroes have at it dissipates once you realize the lugubrious lengths to which the screenplay must go in order to make that happen. Read Full Review » -
40
Chicago Reader
This long-awaited monster mash should satisfy fans of the "Friday the 13th/A Nightmare on Elm Street" franchises. Read Full Review » -
38
New York Post
Despite oblique references to "Psycho" and "Children of the Corn," Freddy vs. Jason lacks the knowing wit needed to keep it afloat in an age when even the horror spoofs have been spoofed. Read Full Review » -
38
Charlotte Observer
Since there can be no suspense, the point is to enjoy the hewing of limbs and the severing of necks, to delight in chopped-off fingers and gouged-out eyes. The title characters are embodiments of utter evil, right? Read Full Review » -
38
-
30
The Onion (A.V. Club)
Aside from a promising scene involving a cornfield rave and the pyrotechnic potential for grain alcohol, it drags along, taking a small eternity to set up a final showdown that plays more like a bloody pro-wrestling event than the stuff of nightmares. Read Full Review » -
30
-
30
The New York Times
This dumb, only intermittently (though sometimes even intentionally) funny sequel presumes that since almost everything else from the 1980's has come back, why not the cynosures of the "Nightmare on Elm Street" and "Friday the 13th" movies? Read Full Review » -
30
Austin Chronicle
The first "Nightmare on Elm Street" was wickedly surreal, but the wacky dream sequences were offset by the sitcomlike, almost satirical flatness of ordinary suburban life; that was the really scary part. Freddy Vs. Jason is innocent of such nuances. Read Full Review » -
30
Slate
The Hong Kong vet director, Ronny Yu, did a bang-up job in 1998 with "Bride of Chucky," but he can't do much for this one except keep it moving, light it scarily, and pump that plasma. Read Full Review » -
30
Washington Post
A kind of cinematic analogue of the Iran-Iraq war: It's overlong, it's hard to tell which one's the bad guy, and it's filled with lots of senseless carnage on both sides. Read Full Review » -
25
Philadelphia Inquirer
Connoisseurs of giant, gnarled chunks of charred flesh, rejoice! There's plenty of it -- or stuff resembling it -- in the slasher-fest convergence of two killer franchises. Read Full Review » -
20
TV Guide
Formulaic hodge-podge that trades on a certain demographic's affection for the bogeymen of their formative years. Read Full Review » -
20
-
20
Village Voice
About as threadbare as a favorite childhood plushy. What's more, trying to keep the story line of strained meta-sequel Freddy Vs. Jason straight requires too much of a cogitative investment. Read Full Review »
You Say
click on a star to rate
